My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00600
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00600
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:52:18 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:41:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/19/1956
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />MR. MOSES: <br /> <br />MR. PUGHE: <br /> <br />3-%- <br />l!1 <br /> <br />River Extension which will require <br />$15,000 to $18,000. We have these in <br />addition to the third group starting <br />with Fruitland Mesa and Bostwick Park." <br /> <br />"I cannot help but believe these projects <br />in the bill are authorized. The reports <br />are prepared but they need some additional <br />study, but very little, and they are <br />authorized. They should not be held <br />up, awaiting completion of those we are <br />studying now." <br /> <br />"I have a question in my mind. We have the <br />money available?" <br /> <br />MR. CRAWFORD: "Yes, $75,000 may be used for study of <br />projects on the Western Slope." <br /> <br />MR. MOSES: <br /> <br />"Mr. Chairman, I would like to make a <br />motion concerning the Silt and Smith <br />Fork Project. I move that these <br />projects be set up with the state <br />contributing the funds that you have set-- <br />funds to assist in the completion of <br />those studies." <br /> <br />MR. FINLINSON: "There might be a question on Pine <br />River Extension. This amendment <br />in the bill states there is no new <br />land to be brought in for a period <br />of ten years." <br /> <br />Mr. Dickson asked for clarification and Mr. <br />Finlinson clarified it. <br /> <br />MR. PUGHE: <br /> <br />"Any further questions concerning the <br />motion?" <br /> <br />The motion was seconded, and on vote being taken, <br />was carried unanimously. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. MOSES: <br /> <br />MR. PUGHE: <br /> <br />"~r. Chairman, I would like to move that <br />Fruitland Mesa be given a priority <br />and the amount of money as set forth <br />as a contribution by the state be <br />offered ~ we have $10,000 to $15,000. <br />If it is found that this would not <br />expedi te the studies, .then it should <br />not be spent at all." <br /> <br />"Do I hear a second?" <br /> <br />The motion was seconded, and on vote being taken, <br />was carried unanimously. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.