BOARD00571 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

128 UBE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that copies of this Re,olution shall be forwarded to the Colorado Senators and Representatives in the Congress of the United States". Motion for the adoption of the resolution was made by Dan B. Hunter, seconded by John W. Beaty. On vote being taken, the resolution was declared adopted. I Director Stone presented for the record a summary of the survey made in the North Park area, under the 1945 Supreme Court decree for the year 19L8. This summary shows: "That there were 130,023 acres of land irrigated in Jackson County, Colorado, during the 1948 season. There is a probability that, except for the limitation imposed by the Supreme Court de- cree, the irrigated acreage in Jackson County will expand. The in- creasingly severe restrictions upon the grazing of livestock in the National Forest necessitates the development of additional irrigated pasture land on the floor of North Park. That 4,475 acre feet of water were stored in reservoirs in the North Platte Basin in Colorado; and that a total of 1,913 acre feet bf water was ex- ported out of the basin for- use in other basins in Colorado." The Director announced that the Board's staff had completed such investigations and compilations for each year since the entry of the North Platte decree. ~ Director Stone, followed by Mr. Breitenstein and Mr. Tipton, dis- cussed the resolutions sponsored by California pending in Congress for the pur- pose of initiating litigation over Color-ado River water. The California pro- .posal is that the Congress give consent to have the United States made a party defendant in any litigation involving the waters of the Colorado River. The -'Director said that the Upper Basin States advocate that litigation be limited as far as possible to controversies in the Lower Basin of the River, and con- fined to a judicial determination under the Colorado River Compact, the Cali- fornia self-limitation statute and the Boulder Canyon Project Act. It was the view of all of the Colorado River Basin States, except California and Nevada, that no justiciable issue now exists. Mr. Breitenstein predicted that a lawsuit will eventually material- ize, and that Colorado.will undoubtedly be drawn into it. He said the State should try to prevent' litigation, but if there is to be a suit, to try to limit the scope of the litigation. Mr. Breitenstein read the text of a resolution, opposing the California suit, and a statement in regard thereto, adopted by a subcommittee of the Upper Colorado River Basin States Committee. The resolu- tion and statement were prepared originally for presentation to the House Judiciary Committee. The resolution reads as follows: "WHEREAS, H.J.Res. 3, and allied resolutions have as their declared purpose the granting of consent to joinder of the United States as a party to interstate Supreme Court litigation involv- ing the use of water of the Colorado River System, and nirHERFAS, such litigation is of vital interest to the Colo- rado River Basin States because of the effect thereof upon the de- velopment of water use projects dependent upon the Colorado River System for a water supply, and I