Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MR. 'l'HOMAS I <br /> <br />"The channel capacity in the area below <br />where the dam is being constructed is only <br />on the order of. well. off the top of my <br />head. it's in the 2.000 to 3.000 second foot <br />range. It is not a big channel capacity. <br />This would give you minor overflow. I think <br />that in order to do substantial damage it <br />would have to be probably several times that <br />flow and I can't tell you exactly what that <br />is." <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. XROMER: <br /> <br />"Are there any possibilities of losing <br />some of the Chatfield development if we get <br />some substantial rain here now?" <br /> <br />MR. 'l'HONAS : <br /> <br />"Not with the water that we think is <br />flowing there now. No. sir. You might lose <br />some of the work to a minor degree but no <br />major loss would take place unless you got <br />something like Mr. Sparks alluded to which <br />would be the 1965 flood. Then I am sure <br />that we would sustain considerable damage <br />at and around the dam site." <br /> <br />MR. XROEGER: <br /> <br />"Are there any other questions? Thanks <br />for your report. <br /> <br />Larry. do you wish to comment?" <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: <br /> <br />"Yes. I think the South Platte River <br />below Bear Creek at this time is reaching <br />a discharge of several thousand second <br />feet. We will get some finite readings on <br />that. If the entire flow that is now in <br />the South Platte River. we'll say at Colfax <br />Avenue. were passing chatfield there would <br />be some problem at Chatfield right this day <br />because the flow does considerably exceed <br />the present channel capacity. Fortunately <br />there is not too great a flow coming out of <br />Plum Creek at this time. Most of the flow <br />is coming in from lower tributaries. from <br />Bear Creek on down. Clear Creek and so on. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Did I understand you to say that now we <br />expect to complete Chatfield in 1975?" <br />