My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00380
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00380
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:49:43 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:37:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/30/1958
Description
Minutes and Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.1086 <br /> <br />Municipal and Industrial Water Supply <br />Flood Control <br />Fish and Wildlife <br />Recreation <br /> <br />$ 5,939,000 <br />4,359,000 <br />4,518,000 <br />304.000 <br />'$15,120,000 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Average annual costs for a 50 year period of analy- <br />sis are estimted to be $695,500. Average annual direct bene- <br />fits are estimated to amount to $1,443,500. On this basis the <br />benefit-cost ratio would be 2.08 to 1. <br /> <br />The only reimbursable costs would be those allocated <br />to municipal and industrial water supply. It is contemplated <br />that repayment would be accomplished under a contract which <br />would insure the return of such costs to the United States <br />with appropriate interest over a 50 year period. Based on <br />the scheduled deliveries proposed by the City of Wichita, the <br />average unit cost of raw water at the reservoir would be about <br />1.9 cents per 1,000 gallons or $6.19 per acre'foot. <br /> <br />A pumping plant, pipeline and pre-treatment works <br />would be required for the delivery and use of the reservoir <br />water in the city. These facilities would not be a part of <br />the Federal project and would be separately financed by the <br />City of Wichita. <br /> <br />The headwaters of the Ninnescah River are in the <br />Southcentra1 portion of the State of Kansas. This river <br />enters the Arkansas River a short distance above the Kansas- <br />Ok1ahoma.State line. The project water involved is not <br />included in any water which has been allocated between Colo- <br />rado and Kansas by the Arkansas River Compact. <br /> <br />It would appear that Colorado's comments should <br />indicate no objection to this proposed project, along with <br />such other views as may be deemed suitable by the Board. <br /> <br />MR. CHRISTY: "I move we adopt Mr. Gildersleeve's <br />recommendations on Colorado's comments <br />on the Cheney Project in Kansas." <br /> <br />MR. W.M.WILLIAMS: "I second the motion." <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: <br /> <br />"You will find included in your <br />folders a copy of the so-called "Wilderness <br />Bill". We have been beseiged by requests <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The motion was unanimously passed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.