My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00330
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00330
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:48:46 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:35:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/27/1968
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
142
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />have invested, apparently, three-quarters of a <br />million dollars or more. I say 'they': <br />I think the Bureau was involved in this more <br />than the state, but it has been turned over <br />to the state now to operate. <br /> <br />They have a visitor's center of 340 <br />acres which is double the size of the lake <br />at 5990. There is a museum there. they've <br />developed a 200,000 gallon water tower, a <br />large boat ramp has been built and the ramp <br />is now covered with silt and mud. A boat <br />cannot be launched from that site at the <br />present water elevation of about 5980. There <br />are comfort stations, picnic grounds and <br />trailer pads. There is a 3300 foot landing <br />strip and there are expansion plans for <br />motels and a restaurant and this type of <br />thing. The concessionaire at the marina <br />has indicated that unless the water level <br />can be brought up he wants to go back on <br />his contract because he just feels it is <br />totally impossible to operate. But last <br />year in spite of the rather serious low <br />water level at the state line, there were <br />some.7800 visitors to this area. <br /> <br />It would seem to me that the values <br />that might be placed recreation-wise <br />measured against the values of power revenue- <br />wise at Glen Canyon should certainly be care- <br />fully considered. I know that you can do a <br />tremendous service for the State of Colorado <br />if you would give this another look. <br /> <br />I might ask Larry if it would be proper <br />for the State Water Board to do some investi- <br />gating of its own on this and come up with <br />recommendations. Certainly that is an agency <br />that would be responsible. They would have <br />to correlate this, I know, with the Game, <br />Fish and Parks, and so on." <br /> <br />MR. CRANDALL: <br /> <br />"We have been aware of this problem, Fred, <br />and would be most receptive and anxious in <br />fact to sit down with the responsible interests <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.