My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00325
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00325
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:48:36 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:35:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/30/1980
Description
Agenda and Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />1 arithmetic here--to $7,463,000 <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />I think that what the Board needs to consider is, <br /> <br />3 first, do you agree with the staff's interim decision that <br /> <br />4 this project did merit emergency consideration such that we <br /> <br />5 have done. If that's the case, there's really no Board action <br /> <br />6 needed, since the bill has already been amended, and it's on <br /> <br />7 its way. If the Board would reconsider and decide that was <br /> <br />8 not a course of action, then we need a motion to that effect, <br /> <br />9 instructing the staff to get that project back out of the bill <br /> <br />10 For your information, let me direct you to your <br /> <br />11 folders. If you go down about three items to what is Agenda <br /> <br />12 Item 4, you should have a short information sheet entitled <br /> <br />"Terrace Reservoir project." This explains the distinction <br /> <br />very briefly--there were two problems. We had some leaky <br /> <br />repairs. One had practically fallen apart and blown out. The <br /> <br />valve openings have been plugged as best they can for the <br /> <br />winter to stop the flow of water. It's imperative the valve <br /> <br />be fixed as rapidly as possible. The spillway is perhaps-- <br /> <br />depending on the outcome of some analysis in the State Enginee 's <br /> <br />office--not adequate to what the federal program requires. <br /> <br />The senate committee specifically excluded funds to build a <br /> <br />new spillway. The committee wanted additional funds to ana- <br /> <br />lyze whether the spillway was really needed from their point <br /> <br />of view. So the $620,000 represents the work that would be <br /> <br />needed to fix the existing valve and the accompanying equip- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.