Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br /> <br />46 <br /> <br />1 as to what the resolution of that issue might be. There are <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />opportunities unexplored of our Division of parks and Outdoor <br /> <br />3 Wildlife as to whether or not they might contribute funding to <br /> <br />4 a project that had public access and public recreation. <br /> <br />5 I think our hesitation is that we do not want to <br /> <br />6 leave the local entity with the impression that they can go <br /> <br />7 forward as now planned as long as this is not resolved to the <br /> <br />8 Board's satisfaction. <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />That's all I have by way of overview. I will answer <br /> <br />10 questions if we have any. <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />MR. JACKSON: Have we funded other reservoirs of <br /> <br />12 this kind where there were no recreational benefits? <br /> <br />13 <br />14 <br /> <br />MR. McDONALD: No, we have not. One was built from <br /> <br />scratch, but that was on Forest Service property, so that's <br /> <br />15 why this issue is new. <br /> <br />16 MR. JACKSON: What are you going to do about Bill <br />17 617 <br /> <br />18 MR. McDONALD: Bill 67 could well get passed with <br /> <br />19 Meadow Creek in it. I do not think that's a problem, Bob, <br /> <br />because in our transmittal to the legislature recommending <br /> <br />that project, the conditions that the Board discussed in the <br /> <br />December meeting were included in that report. ~ therefore, <br /> <br />would consider the legislature on notice that until the Board <br /> <br />is satisfied as to those conditions, we will not enter into <br /> <br />contracts to build. <br />