My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00284
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00284
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:48:13 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:34:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/12/1971
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />of that reservoir as a flood control project. <br />However, as far as my own thinking is concerned, <br />if the project has to be delayed for a year or <br />a little longer in order to accomplish munici- <br />pal storage, it would be worth it. We don't <br />want to lose any opportunity for municipal <br />storage in any of these projects." <br /> <br />MR. OGILVIE: <br /> <br />"From our standpoint we can move ahead on <br />it in much less time than that. I realize the <br />Corps through their process of reauthorization, <br />that this is going to take about a year." <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: <br /> <br />"The reauthorization problem would be in <br />Congress." <br /> <br />MR. OGILVIE: <br /> <br />"I understand from the Corps standpoint, <br />of course t~ey are having some trouble with <br />financing and the delay may already be build- <br />ing itself into their program." <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: <br /> <br />"I am sure it's not going to proceed as <br />rapidly as we had hoped." <br /> <br />MR. OGILVIE: <br /> <br />"Right. <br /> <br />One other point that you mentioned with <br />respect to ecology, Larry, I'd like to point <br />out to the Board that we have set up in cooper- <br />ation with COSC and with ROMCOE a committee <br />composed of representatives from the Water <br />Department and from the environmentalists, <br />COSC, ROMCOE, people that are interested in <br />this aspect of water development and we are <br />meeting regularly with this committee to estab- <br />lish discussion concerning our proposals and <br />this committee that we have set up is primarily <br />directed to those facilities which we would be <br />constructing on our own. Nevertheless, we <br />anticipate getting a little mileage out of our <br />committee with respect to Two Forks also and <br />I think we are making some progress in this <br />respect. We are taking the aggressive atti- <br />tude and working with these people, getting <br />their suggestions and believe me, some of their <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.