BOARD00226 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

and with representatives of the Rio Grande Water Conservation District for a meeting with the congressional delegation in hopes that we can get the Closed Basin report released by the Bureau of the Budget. '!'he report on the Closed Basin Project has been held up by the Bureau of the Budget for some time now. Under the project legislation which the Board approved about a year ago and which has since been introduced by members of our con- gressional delegation, we have proposed that the first 60,000 acre-feet of-water would be purely a federal expense. This is based upon the fact that the united States in addition to giving away the water of the Colorado River also gave water from the Rio Grande aiver to the Republic of Mexico for reasons expressed in the treaty as being international comity. I don't know whether that is spelled 'comedy' or 'comity'. In any event I do not know what it means. We have suggested th~t since the United States so generously gave water which originates in the southwest to the Republic of Mexico, all of the united States should pay for it. This is the theory upon which the bill was introduced. It provides that the first 60,000 feet, which is the amount given to the Republic of Mexico, be furnished at federal expense. '!'he Bureau of the Budget has taken a peculiar attitude with reference to the bill. As an excuse for not delivering the report to Congress, the Bureau of the Budget states that there is no agreement among Texas, New Mexico and Colorado concerning the bill. It is none of the Bureau's business whether or not the states have agreed on it or not. That is a matter for Congress to decide. It is a most exasperating thing because we can do nothing about the bill as long as it is in the Bureau of the Budget. It has to get to Congress if any agreement on the legislation is to be reached. '!'his is really a ruse not to let it out of the Bureau of the Budget at all. Anyway, I I