My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00198
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00198
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:46:59 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:33:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/15/1969
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />in the first go-round here we set up a <br />different procedure, a different method, for <br />bringing the wells on the Platte and the <br />Arkansas into the adjudication system, using <br />somebody else as a referee r~ther than a <br />division engineer in view of the tremendous <br />worklog. Now that bill is still in the <br />process of being worked out. <br /> <br />I don't know, Glenn, do you have any- <br />thing to add here today?" <br /> <br />MR. SAUNDERS: <br /> <br />"The last thing Jim said is important, <br />I think. The two things that are in your <br />letter, the two paragraphs that Larry has <br />said need some action are actually in draft <br />form. He had called attention to the fact <br />that there will be a tremendous work load to <br />try to integrate 5,000 wells into the adjudi- <br />cation system. The plan there in general is, <br />I'm going to change the word on you, Jim, not <br />for a different method than is provided in the <br />bill, but a hearing board or boards under the <br />method shown in the bill which will relieve <br />the load which is on the division engineer. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />One reason these things had to wait a <br />bit, you remember that this Board a few years <br />ago appointed a committee and worked on some <br />legislation about a water court. We had two <br />bills that were approved by this Board's <br />legislative committee. One of those was for <br />a water court and this is still available of <br />course but the thought has been Which way do <br />you go? A great deal of discussion was given <br />to this and the method devised in the bill of <br />having the present district courts do this <br />matter, this adjudication, just as in the past <br />upon the basis of facts found by the division <br />engineer as a referee, was accepted as probably <br />more palatable to the whole state. But we <br />haven't lost track of the bill that we did a <br />year or so ago. Ray Moses, Larry Sparks, I, <br />and I think three members of this Board worked <br />on that a bit with Dick Eckles. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.