My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00198
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00198
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:46:59 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:33:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/15/1969
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MR. GEISSINGER: <br /> <br />"Mr. Chairman, first I would like to <br />review briefly for the Board the reasons and <br />where this suggested legislation came from. <br />I think it is real important that we get this <br />in the proper perspective because as your <br />Director has just told you, this very complex <br />problem has been the subject matter of various <br />bills in the Colorado legislature since the <br />early 40's. Something very similar, so I <br />was told by Frank Delaney the other day, was <br />advocated by A. W. McHendrie, one of the <br />deans of water lawyers of the State of COlo- <br />rado, back in the 40's. It's geared in all <br />respects to the constitutional appropriation <br />doctrine. Everything in all of these various <br />bills is tied in with the rule of first in <br />time, first in right, which, by the way, has <br />been followed in most of our neighboring <br />states. Many of those states have what is <br />known as the permit system where the indivi- <br />dual water user goes in before the state <br />engineer and acquires his water right, <br />acquires a certificate and adjudications <br />only take place upon being initiated by the <br />state engineer or a certain number of water <br />users within a district. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />We have the straight adjudication system <br />in this state and have had it since the earli- <br />est days of our statehood, l876. It is a good <br />system. We are too far down along the road <br />at this time to go to a permit system. How- <br />ever, what we have done in this first bill is <br />transfer a lot of the functions that were <br />formerly performed by the courts exclusively <br />to the division engineers and the state. In <br />comment here, we realize what the problem is. <br />There are four or five thousand wells that <br />will have to be adjudicated in one district <br />alone. In our housekeeping bill, which isn't <br />completed yet, we are, and it's indicated in <br />here, setting up a hearing section within the <br />office of the state engineer. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Now the concept of the division engineer <br />doing these things is more or less like the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.