My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00198
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00198
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:46:59 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:33:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/15/1969
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />U~UJ <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />permit system in other states but, in the <br />final analysis here, we are going to stay <br />with the courts for the adjudication of our <br />water rights so that there can be no charges <br />from any quarters that the state engineer or <br />the division engineer has been arbitrary and <br />capricious in his action or that he is a <br />czar. Once these proceedings are completed, <br />the decrees of those courts will be his warrant <br />of authority to administer the water rights in <br />much the same manner as we have it today. The <br />problem is bringing these wells into the <br />system. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Starting with these engineering reports, <br />there were preliminary reports furnished to <br />the legislature during its last session. As <br />far as the Arkansas was concerned, there were <br />no final reports. On the Platte we only <br />studied two districts, one and sixty-four. <br />I think that the staff of the Water Board, <br />if I recall correctly, has completed the <br />studies on two but they were too busy and it <br />was too voluminous to get the work out. In <br />any event, they weren't completed and we had <br />to have more than two districts covered on <br />the Platte. Obviously, and all of the engi- <br />neers are in accord on this, both those within <br />the state and the professional firm of Clyde <br />and Criddle employed on one of these studies <br />from the State of utah, but the point that <br />I desire to make is that they all felt that <br />we had to go to a basin concept. We had to <br />administer these waters, the total supply, <br />within the basin. I am sure this is also the <br />view of the United States Geological Survey, <br />the Bureau of Reclamation, and any and all <br />others. In other words, you only have so much <br />water to satisfy these rights, water rights <br />don't make water, so you have got to figure <br />what is this total supply. Of course, that <br />was the principal engineering job that had to <br />be completed on the Platte and the Arkansas. <br /> <br />I met with the engineers from a half day <br />to a full day for about, well, beginning in <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.