My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00196
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00196
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:46:53 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:33:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
11/29/1955
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />'" <br />-<l-36 <br /> <br />3,. <br /> <br />Situation with Regard to Studies on Parshall. Eagle <br />Divide. Battlement Mesa and Bostwick Projects <br /> <br />MR. CRAWFORD: <br /> <br />~. RITER: <br /> <br />. MR. PETERSON: <br /> <br />MR. CRAWFORD: <br /> <br />MR. PETERSON: <br /> <br />"We had a meeting about two months ago <br />in my office. Those attending were <br />Mr. Riter. Mr. Jerman. Mr. Mosley and <br />Mr. Phil Smith. The meeting was called <br />on account of the situation with regard <br />to availability of water in the river- <br />which is supposed to serve the Parshall <br />Project. After going over that. it <br />appeared. that the water wasn't available. <br />Is that a correct statement, Mr. Riter?" <br /> <br />"Before we could go ahead with the <br />Parshall Project, we would have to see <br />what Denver was going to do: (1) How <br />much water Denver would take out and <br />(2) How much will Denver enlarge Williams <br />Fork Reservoir? Mr. Mosley could not <br />give us any figures on that. He said <br />they were conducting studies on that <br />subject, If Denver decrees were fulfilled, <br />there would not be anything left for <br />development of the Parshall Project. We <br />should know what Denver is going to do <br />before making studies on Parshall." <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />"I would like to ask the Director who <br />was at this meeting." <br /> <br />"Riter, Jerman, myself, Mosley and <br />Phil Smith from the Bureau office in <br />Grand Junction." <br /> <br />"I was concerned about this. :The peop~e <br />on the Western Slope would like to be <br />represented on those meetings. It seems <br />~o me that they have quite a stake in <br />that water. They have been planning on <br />a project for irrigation for their local <br />area and I think they are--I know they <br />are--vifally interested in it. I think <br />it would be proper, in calling such a <br />meeting having to do with water of par- <br />ticular irrigation projects, that a <br />representative from the immediate area <br />should be called in on all meetings." <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.