Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />~37 <br /> <br />MR. CRAWFORD: "The meeting was called for looking into water <br />rights," <br /> <br />MR. RIITER: "I will take.the responsibility for calling <br />that meeting. In the reconnaissance report <br />on Parshall, one thing that will have to be <br />settled is the question of water rights." <br /> <br />MR. CRAWFORD: "It is brought to the Board as an item of <br />information at this time." <br /> <br />MR. RITER: "It cannot be settled until we know to what <br />extent Denver plans to utilize its conditional <br />decree on Williams Fork. I wanted to try to <br />resolve it. However, Mosley said he was not <br />able to resolve it at this time." <br /> <br />MR. CRAWFORD: "The question is: If we can't go ahead with <br />Parshall, what others should be considered?" <br /> <br />DUANE BARNARD: "Does anyone from Denver have anything to say <br />about this?" <br /> <br />MR. PETRY: <br /> <br />"Money for the extension of Williams Fork has <br />been included in the recent bond issue, <br />Studies for that are going on now. In round <br />figures, it looks as though the reservoir might <br />be 70~OOO acre feet," <br /> <br />MR. BAILEY: <br /> <br />"I think that if there are any further meetings <br />on that subject, we should get in touch with <br />someone on the Western Slope." <br /> <br />"I assumed our office on the Western Slope <br />could spea~ for that section of the State." <br /> <br />Further discussion of the subject followed. <br /> <br />MR. RITER: <br /> <br />After considerable discussion of the possibility of <br />setting a date for a meeting, Mr. Peterson made the following <br />motion. <br />