My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00188
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00188
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:46:44 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:32:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
11/14/1962
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MR. PETERSON: <br /> <br />l>1R. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />MR. GEISSINGER: <br /> <br />already on top of that and hope that we will <br />not have the same problem at Crystal that <br />is facing us now at Green l>1ountain." <br /> <br />"I had reference primarily to Green <br />Mountain." <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />"\tIe'll now bring up some new business. <br />I'd like to have Jimmy Geissinger report on <br />the Costilla Creek Compact if he will, and <br />also Mr. i'lhitten. n <br /> <br />"Mr. Chairman, members, for the past <br />several years we have been working on a <br />problem in connection with Costilla Creek <br />diversions. I think perhaps by way of back- <br />ground, it would be well to mention the fact <br />that the Costilla Creek Compact, as it now <br />exists, is perhaps one of the most detailed <br />compacts we have. By that I mean it goes into <br />detail on the points of diversions for the <br />various ditches diverting from that stream and <br />there are no provisions in the compact itself <br />for amendments to the compact. <br /> <br />Mr. Moses, who is the attorney for the <br />Board, represents the Colorado water users <br />in this matter and he has gone into the Dis- <br />trict Court of Colorado to try to seek a change <br />of point of diversion on behalf of those water <br />users. Of course what we have here simply is <br />this, we have an interstate stream winding in <br />and out of the two states and we have this <br />compact superimposed upon the jurisdiction of <br />the courts of both Colorado and New Mexico and <br />the river is handled entirely, as far as its <br />administration, through the Compact Commis- <br />sioners, 11r. i1.hitten of Colorado and Mr. <br />Reynolds of New Mexico. For several years the <br />Compact Commission has been concerned with this <br />problem. <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />\tlhat these amendments primarily do is <br />change the point of diversion from present place <br />of diversion to another ditch. New Mexico has <br />taken the position consistently that this is <br />a matter of substance. So the Commission, at <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.