Laserfiche WebLink
<br />5 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br /> <br />Let me go back and deal with those three categories <br /> <br />one at a time so we can sort through it. First of all, <br /> <br />to give us something to glance at, why don I t you refer <br /> <br /> <br />to Senate Bill 67, which is attached to the April 29th <br /> <br /> <br />memorandum, "Subject: Revised Agenda Item 2 -- Considera- <br /> <br /> <br />tion of Additional Construction Projects for Authoriza- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />tion.1T <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />If you would, turn to the very last page of that <br />bill. In Section 4 of the bill -- and this is the bill <br />as passed and amended by the House -- you see project <br />deauthorizations, Keenesburg and Brighton, both of which <br /> <br />were formerly recommended for the authorization to the <br /> <br />legislature at our last Board meeting. <br /> <br />After our last Board meeting we received a letter <br /> <br /> <br />from the City of Montrose informing us that they likewise <br /> <br /> <br />no longer have an interest in proceeding with their <br /> <br /> <br />previously authorized project. <br /> <br />I simply referred that matter to the legislature and <br /> <br /> <br />it's now in the bill, but the legislature would like a <br /> <br /> <br />formal indication of the Board's concurrence with that. <br /> <br /> <br />Nick, I believe you have the letter, if you would <br />briefly read it. <br /> <br /> <br />MR. IOANNIDES: Okay. "In 1976 the City of ~ontrose <br /> <br /> <br />requested financial assistance from the Colorado Water <br /> <br /> <br />Conservation Board Construction Fund for 1 million dollars <br />