My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00100
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00100
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:44:48 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:31:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/11/1960
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.....,Vl <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />There are just two or three points I <br />want to make in summary. I want to assure <br />the irrigators that the Game and Fish Depart- <br />ment has assured me, and I think they are <br />attempting to assure the state at large I that <br />they are not intending to try to take any <br />water away from anybody. If they get water, <br />it will be good water and they will pay for <br />it. And I as Larry said, it will go through <br />the courts to be sure we have the proper use <br />for that water. <br /> <br />The Game and Fish Department is also <br />willing to assume its proportionate share for <br />the transportation of this water and evapora- <br />tion losses. We recognize, I say 'we' speak- <br />ing now as Game and Fish rather than the <br />Water Board, that they have to live in this <br />community and are expected to act just the <br />same as all other citizens of the community <br />and they are willing to do that. <br /> <br />In closing, I just hope that the opponents <br />- the past opponents - to this proposal will <br />not continue to fall back on the rather thread- <br />bare situation now of an operational plan. <br />I'd hate to see them come up six Or eight <br />months from now and say 'You still have no <br />operational plan', because as Larry said, the <br />reservoir will be operated as a channel reser- <br />voir and there is a procedure for that opera- <br />tion and details for handling this relatively <br />small amount of water, 10,000 acre~feet, in <br />that terrifically large reservoir will be <br />worked out in accordance to a plan, and I'd <br />like to ask the people who are involved, to <br />please be patient until we have a chance to <br />work this thing out and don't continually <br />come back and say 'You don't have a plan' <br />because I am sure there will be a plan by <br />that time. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Another thing, please don't insist that <br />the Game and Fish Department or that the <br />State Engineer's office or your own Board, <br />say where this water may be coming from. If <br />you do, it's going to cost the state some <br />money. Give us a chance to see if we can find <br />it and evaluate it and get a price on it before <br />you come demanding 'Where are you going to get <br />this. water? Who are you going to buy it from <br />and what price are you going to pay?'. Because <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.