BOARD00064 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

1 1 556 is the addition of the per diem compensa- tion during time spent in litigation and also the 30 day cancellation clause. Other than that I think it almost identical with that which the Board has entered into be- fore." MR. PETERSON: "That portion pertaining to the per diem is a matter to be brought before the Board and decided; therefore, it cannot be too ob- tionable as we would have to negotiate further and pass on it." MR. DUNBAR: "That's true. The only difference is that previously the compensation covered everything. It has been changed now for time spent in actual court cases and considered on a different basis." MR. PETERSON: "As to how much - that will be decided upon by the Board. That part will not be ob- jectionable, I am sure, inasmuch as we do have the right to negotiate the per diem." MR. DUNBAR: "It doesn't amount to additionalcompensa- tion but just expenses." MR. CRAWFORD: "In the case of Mr. Chilson the additional compensation amounted to $100.00 per day for representation in court." GOVERNOR JOHNSON: "It doesn't seem to me there is any great impediment in the cont ract. As I stated pre- viously, the contract would be approved by the Board and if the attorney didn't accept its terms there would be a vacancy. The attorney will be elected subject to his approval to such a contract." MR. DUNBAR: '~ouldn't it be better to leave it this way - that if the attorney selected does not agree to the terms of this contract and had his own ideas as to what this contract should contain, the Board will negotiate with him and see what can be worked out?" GOVERNOR JOHNSON: "Yes. I think that would be part of it. It would be a matter of negotiation between the person selected and the Board. This Board will want to give some attention to this contract and see does the attorney agree "to its terms. You might consider this before you elect him but I think the Board could