My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00064
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00064
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:44:01 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:31:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
12/17/1956
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />553 <br /> <br />GOVERNOR JOHNSON: <br /> <br />MR. DUNBAR: <br /> <br />GOVERNOR JOHNSON: <br /> <br />r.1R. McCANDLESS: <br /> <br />GOVERNOR JOHNSON: <br /> <br />MR. DUNBAR: <br /> <br />GOVERNOR JOHNSON: <br /> <br />MR. DUNBAR: <br />GOVERNOR JOHNSON: <br /> <br />at this time or not. The matter of <br />the contents of the contract or agree- <br />ment that would be entered into between <br />the Board and the attorney. There are <br />certain items in there which were a mat- <br />ter of discussion before and the question <br />is whether we should get any commitments 1- <br />from either of these two gentlemen as to <br />whether or not they would be agreeable to <br />enter into the same contract as existed <br />between Mr. Chilson and the Board. I don't <br />know whether this matter should be dis- <br />cussed at this time or not." <br /> <br />"If it is pertinent to the decision the <br />Board is going to make, I think the Board <br />ought to know their reaction to this con- <br />tract. " <br /> <br />"Suppose the attorney selected didn't <br />agree to the contents of this contract?" <br /> <br />"Seems to me this question should be <br />settled now." <br /> <br />''Mr. Chairman, couldn't he be selected <br />with the idea he would agree to the contract <br />before he is given final approval by the <br />Governor and the Attorney General?" <br /> <br />"I think it would be almost automatic <br />that if he didn't agree to the contract <br />offered by this Board, he would be elimi- <br />nated from the candidacy." <br /> <br />"The contract runs considerably in <br />favor of the attorney rather than the <br />Board. " <br /> <br />'~ou don't think there is any danger <br />in that? Having the contract drawn in <br />that way? Is the contract properly drawn <br />- shouldn't it be more binding on the at- <br />torney and less on the Board if that's <br />the case?" <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />"I think it had better be changed." . <br /> <br />"If the contract heretofore made with <br />the attorney is not fully in protection <br />of the Board then the contract itself <br />ought to be modified so that the Board <br />does remain in charge of the situation <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.