Laserfiche WebLink
<br />4~~U <br /> <br /><-. <br /> <br />I think the first of these that I should <br />mention is the Narrows Project. It is one <br />that was authorized at one time, construction <br />started, there was a long delay, and at a <br />meeting of your Board just a few months ago <br />we had a decision that permitted us to go <br />forward with the feasibility studies of the <br />Harrows Project as we now envision it today. <br />He have a general schematic map hanging on the <br />pipe (pointing) that shows the Narrows damsite <br />and the reservoir area. The damsite is located <br />about five miles upstream from the City of <br />Fort Horgan. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />During the last couple of \-leeks \~e have <br />had devastating floods that have gone down the <br />Platte River, one of them starting at Plum <br />Creek above the City of Denver. Numerous tribu- <br />taries and the South Platte itself were at very <br />high stages. A flood crest passed Fort Morgan <br />and Sterling that was devastating to property <br />and to irrigation systems along the way. The <br />Narrows unit would have been a very valuable <br />flood control project with an occurrence such <br />as we have recently experienced. <br /> <br />The status of the studies on the Harrows <br />is that feasibility work has progressed to a <br />state where we are anticipating completion of <br />the feasibility grade report by October. The <br />recent flood has caused renewed interest in the <br />handling of Bijou Creek, because it reached a <br />very high crest and passed through the Platte <br />basin do\-mstream from the Narrows damsite and <br />contributed to very significant flood damages. <br /> <br />In past studies we have considered the <br />construction of a dike from the main dam that <br />\-lould cut off Bijou Creek before it enters the I <br />South Platte River. This would also involve 'a <br />channelization from Bijou Creek into the body <br />of the reservoir to handle the sediment and the <br />general path of the \-later. NO\'1 this dike has, <br />to date, been considered infeasible because the <br />benefits that would be assessed by the Corps oi <br />Engineers for control of Bijou would not justify <br />