Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Appendix to Question No.8 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />l. Elepbrt Ho. 2. 3. Recipient' 8 Accession NI'. <br /> CSU-FNR-1052-1 , <br />4. Ticle 5. Report Date <br /> Ecological Impacts of Snowpack Au~entat1on in the San Juan March 1976 <br /> 6. <br /> Mountains .of Colorado <br />7. Author(.) 8. PerforminR Organization Report No. <br /> Harold W. Steinhoff and Jack D. Iv.. (Ed. \ <br />9. P~rforming Organization HalDe and Address Q. Work Unit No. <br /> College of Forestry and Natural Resourc.es <br /> Colorado State University l. Contract or Grant Ho. <br /> Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 14-06-0-7052 <br />2. Sponsoring Agency Name a.ad Address J. Type of Report <br /> Bureau of Reclamation Final Report <br /> BuUding 61, Denver Pedera1 Center 4. <br /> Denver, Colorado B0225 <br />5. Supplementary Note. <br /> This document Tepresent. a coop8ratl~e re.earch effort between Colorado State University. the University. of <br /> Colorado, aDd Fort Lewie College. Thla report super.ade. the prevlou8 Interim Progress Report9 of 1971. <br /> 1973, and 1915. -Alao, thia report has been designated as a contribution to the United Nationa Man and the <br /> Bioephere (HAB-6) Program. <br />6. Abstract <br />The Collowing conclusions summarize tbe work of 33 scientists from Colorado State University. the Universlty <br />of Colorado. and Fort 'Levis Cellege vbo studied the effecc. of VaryinR snOWDacK on the ecosystems uf the S~n <br />Juan Mountains in Colorado from 1970 to 1975. Initiat10n of shoot elongation waa delayed tor plnnts tn the <br />tundra and foreate .s a readlt of lower teaperature. a..ociated with deeper snowpack. The deIRY WQS mnAt ~p- <br />parent for herbaceous speciea. such 8S Thurber fe.c.... (Fescuc. thurberl), Whoa. growth points lay tn the <br />immediate zone of -lover tampetature at ground lavel. The effect on tree. auch .1 Engelmann spruce (~ <br />enaelmanii) and quaking aapen (PopulUS tremulo!des) va. less. The result was a decrease in hlomAsa production <br />of herbaceous speeie8, but not of trees.or of Ca&bel oak (Quercus gambellii), vfi1cn was fOUIld in a zone that <br />became snow clear very early. The delay in beginning of growth persisted through the other stages of the <br />annual cycles of ~st plants but with less magnitude. There seemed universally a COmDenRAtfnn far.~nr which <br />permitted each species to compress its annual cycle in.years with a shorter grOWing-season caused by greater <br />depth ~ack. PhytoBociological studies 1n both forests and tundra showed that plant communltTes~ " <br />arranged along a snow clear date gradient. In the forest. Gambel oak gives way to quaking aspen, then to suh- <br />alpine fir (~.la8iocarpa). and finally to Engelmann spruce, as the snow'clear date extends later lnto <br />the year. A noticeable decline in fotest populationa of deer mice (Pero~ySCUS maniculatus) and; to a lesRer <br />extent, chipmunks (Eutamias spp.) and Microtus spp.. followed ~nters of heavy snowfall. The basic reaSOn <br />was a dplAv in br@@din2 and in availability of essential foods. No similar effect was found for" "the pock.et <br />gopher (Tho~mys talpoldes) or mountain toad (Bufo boreas). !It (Cervua canadensis) were almost excluded <br />from reRlons with more than 70 em of oenetrable Bnow depth. And their travel V88 noticeably restricted at <br />depths over 40 em. Hovement of elk to higher elevations in spring coincided with the initiation of growth ..f <br />h&rbaceous nlanta rather-than directly with the recedlng snow line, and adequate calvlnR areas were alwaYR I <br />present. Plant litter 1n the tundra decreased tn areas 0 deeper .novpack. Local chanKes in the rate of <br />8011 ero.ion may lncre.le by a factor ot J.U a. a re.ult 0 tbe Rreater area 01 bare 80U left by. "the rltH::re~Mt~ <br />in vegetative cover around snOWbankS. e area 1avo ve 81 IUDa~J. and Chua the tota impact s very sma re2ionall . The long te~ c11mat1c trend since 1930 haa been toward higher temperatures and leg~ precipitat~nl~ <br />with short term fluctuations. of a few years, from relatively dry to' wet modes. No siRnificant increase~ In <br />silver concentration were detected. because of the ~all amounts added in cloud seed inK and the hl~h back- <br />2round levels of silver in the target area. No deleterious effects of silver iodide have ~een found at con- <br />centrations which cou.ld be expected due to C.10UO seea.l.ng. --J <br />17. Key Words lB. Dlstribution Ststement <br />alpine tundra. aspen, climate, cloud seeding. Col~rado. Available Protll: <br /> National Technical Information Setvice <br />ecology, eco8yste~. elk, environmental impact, fescue, Springfield, Virginia 22151 <br />forests, geomorphology, oak, phenology, phytosociology, <br />productivity. 53n Juan Mountains, stlver iodide. small <br />nmmmals, snow, spruce. weathef modification. <br />19. Secuicty Cla8s!f. of this report 20. Security Cla581f~ of this page 2l. No. of pageB 22. Price <br /> t;nclasslf~ed Unclassified 4B9 <br /> . <br />