Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />~ <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />.' <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />.' <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />.1 <br />\ <br />. <br />. <br />'. <br />. <br />. <br />'. <br />. <br />(j <br />. <br />. <br />.' <br />. <br /> <br />became routine, Before this system was developed, data had to be acquired by visiting the site to <br />make manual measurements (e,g, snow surveys), which are still being done to the present time at <br />a few sites in the western United States. <br /> <br />The 2003 NRCS data are considered provisional at the time this report is being prepared. <br />There are some concerns regarding SNOTEL observations of precipitation in higher elevations <br />during the wintertime. Precipitation normally occurs as snow at these elevations, often <br />accompanied by moderate or strong winds. Snow can build up around the top of the <br />precipitation standpipe storage gage, thereby reducing its catch and under-measuring <br />precipitation. Moderate to strong winds can cause the snow to blow past the top of the storage <br />gage, which also reduces its catch efficiency. These clogging and wind factors may be a <br />function of the density of the snow, which can vary from storm to storm, Whether these factors <br />affect the target and control gages in the same fashion in any given winter season is debatable. <br /> <br />5.1.1 Control Area Precipitation Gage Sites <br /> <br />There have been, and continue to be, several cloud seeding programs conducted in the <br />State of Colorado. As a consequence, potential control areas that are unaffected by cloud <br />seeding are somewhat limited in geographic area. This is complicated by the fact that the best <br />correlated control sites are generally those closest to the target area, and most measurement sites <br />in this part of the state have been subjected to "contamination" by numerous historical and <br />current seeding programs. This renders such sites of questionable value for use as control sites, <br />since the actual impact from cloud seeding on a season to season basis is difficult to quantify. <br /> <br />To further complicate the matter, the number of sites (especially snow course sites) is <br />continually being reduced. Even the cooperative observer sites, which are managed by the <br />National Weather Service, have either been discontinued or become inactive at several locations. <br /> <br />NA WC performed another evaluation of a new cloud seeding project conducted this past <br />winter in the Central Colorado Rockies and sponsored by Denver Water. One of the steps in the <br />development of a target/control evaluation of that project was a comprehensive search of all <br /> <br />47 <br />