My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00196
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
Backfile
>
WMOD00196
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:28:34 PM
Creation date
10/1/2006 2:15:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Contract/Permit #
2003-01
Sponsor Name
Gunnison County, City of Gunnison, Crested Butte
Project Name
WM Evaluation Report
Title
The Development, Conduct and Evaluation of a Cloud Seeding Program for the Gunnison River Basin, CO During the 2003-04 Season
Date
8/1/2004
County
Gunnison
State
CO
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Reports
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br />.' <br />. <br />. <br />.\ <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />'. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />., <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />(I <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />Grand Mesa. However, we were reluctant to exclude this site entirely, due to its significant <br />contribution to the historical regression equation, and the better target/control correlation which <br />could be obtained by including this SNOTEL site. Therefore, we decided to show two different <br />results in both the precipitation and snowpack analyses, corresponding to regression equations <br />which include/exclude this target site. <br /> <br />Experience has shown that it is virtually impossible to provide an accurate assessment of <br />the effectiveness of cloud seeding over one or two winter-spring seasons. However, as the data <br />sample size increases, it becomes possible to provide at least a qualitative answer to the question <br />of, "How effective was the seeding?" Since this past winter season represents the first seeded <br />season, only general indications of the success of the seeding would be expected at best. <br /> <br />Using the target-control comparison described above, mathematical relationships for the <br />variables (both precipitation and snowpack) were determined between a group of sites in the <br />unseeded (control) areas and the sites in the seeded (target) area. From these data, predictor <br />equations were developed, where the average value of the variable observed in the unseeded <br />(control) areas was used to predict the average value of the variable in the seeded (target) area in <br />the absence of seeding. A positive difference between the observed amount and the predicted <br />amount in the seeded area (target) during seeded periods may indicate a positive result of <br />seeding. A negative difference may indicate that the seeding decreased the precipitation (an <br />unlikely occurrence) or that the regression equation did not have a high enough correlation to <br />provide an accurate prediction. <br /> <br />5.1 Precipitation Analysis <br /> <br />Precipitation data used in the analysis were obtained from the Natural Resources <br />Conservation Service (NRCS) and/or from the National Climatic Data Center, and represent the <br />official published records of those organizations. Similar snowpack (water content) records used <br />in the snowpack analysis were also obtained from the NRCS. When the NRCS, known then as <br />the Soil Conservation Service (SCS), introduced the SNOTEL data acquisition system in the late <br />1970's, access to precipitation and snowpack (water equivalent) data in mountainous locations <br /> <br />46 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.