My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00047
CWCB
>
Publications
>
Backfile
>
PUB00047
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2011 11:11:14 AM
Creation date
9/30/2006 10:09:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2000
Title
SECWD/Arkansas Basin Preferred Storage Options Plan Final Draft Report
Author
GEI Consultants, Inc
Description
SECWD/Arkansas Basin Preferred Storage Options Plan Final Draft Report
Publications - Doc Type
Water Resource Studies
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Final Draft - Preferred Storage Options Plan <br />Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District <br />June 8, 2000 <br /> <br />primarily to support the legal, administrative, engineering, and environmental studies for NEPA <br />compliance, EIS preparation, and agency approvals. <br /> <br />Reservoir Enlargements <br /> <br />The costs for reservoir enlargements ($75.6 million for Pueblo and $14.5 million for Turquoise <br />in January 2000 dollars) include engineering, permitting, environmental, legal, construction, and <br />mitigation costs. The PSOP envisions that the cost of new storage (totaling $90.1 million) would <br />be funded by the participating entities as follows: <br /> <br />. Participating entities would fund their share of the reservoir enlargements using their own <br />funding sources. <br /> <br />. The District Water Management Storage (10,000 to 15,000 af) would be funded through <br />a 50-50 cost share between the District and entities participating in the reservoir <br />enlargements. <br /> <br />. The District's share of the cost would be funded through a low-interest CWCB loan with <br /> <br />repayment covered by a Development/O&M fund, which also would provide funds for <br />+l.,o n;........;.....+'.... ....1-.nr^ 0"0&1\,{ ........ +1-...... ........,'!! ...+....._~~.... <br />LU\..> J..Jj';)Ul\.<L .;) .;)UQ \,.. 1 IV.1 VU LJI~ 11I;:;'YV ;::'LVla!:.c, <br /> <br />The District's Development/O&M fund would accomplish the following goals: meet existing <br />Safety of Dams (SOD) repayment obligations; fund the Winter Water spill credit; pay for the <br />District's share of new storage development and O&M; create a Fry-Ark Project O&M reserve <br />fund; provide funds to prepare for transfer of Fry-Ark Project O&M to the District; and fund <br />District oversight ofthe_J:nlargements of Pueblo Reservoir and Turquoise Lake. Proposed rates <br />for generating the Development/O&M fund are summarized below: <br /> <br />J \PROJECTS\99061\Reports\Prc:fn-m:! SOP Filial wpd <br /> <br />VII <br /> <br />~ GEl Consultants, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.