Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />TABLE 2-4 <br /> <br />EGEAS Alternative Model Scenarios Maximizina Intearated ODerations <br /> <br />Model <br />Run No. <br /> <br />Primary System <br /> <br />Interconnected <br />Utilities <br /> <br />Centel <br />Colorado Springs <br />Colorado Ute <br />PRPA <br />Tri-State <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />PSCO <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />Tri-State <br /> <br />Centel <br />Colorado Springs <br />Colorado Ute <br />PRPA <br />PSCO <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />Colorado Springs <br /> <br />Centel <br />Colorado Ute <br />PRPA <br />PSCO <br />Tri-State <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />Centel <br /> <br />Colorado Springs <br />Colorado Ute <br />PRPA <br />PSCO <br />Tri-State <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />Colorado Ute <br /> <br />Centel <br />Colorado Springs <br />PRPA <br />PSCO <br />Tri-State <br /> <br />6. <br /> <br />PRPA <br /> <br />Centel <br />Colorado Springs <br />Colorado Ute <br />PSCO <br />Tri-State <br /> <br />A life-cycle type of cost analysis was used to determine each utility'S annual costs or <br />revenue requirements under these six model scenarios, and these costs and <br />requirements were then aggregated for the entire state of Colorado. Life cycle <br />analyses for the period of study reflect price conditions expected in each year of the <br /> <br />2-9 <br />