My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00037
CWCB
>
Publications
>
Backfile
>
PUB00037
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2010 8:58:17 AM
Creation date
9/30/2006 10:08:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
1988
Title
Colorado Joint Planning Study Economic Potential of Pumped Storage
CWCB Section
Interstate & Federal
Author
Colorado Water Resources and Power Development Authority
Description
Assessment of whether pumped storage facilities are economically attractive to Colorado utilities
Publications - Doc Type
Water Resource Studies
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />evaluation period and current interest rates as they relate to price inflation, and <br />provide for replacement of facilities as needed to keep the system operating. The <br />least-cost alternative for each. scenario for each entity modeled as a primary system <br />was determined using a present-worth analysis of future revenue requirements. <br />These results are discussed in Chapter 3. <br /> <br />2.4 Optimization With Pumped Storage <br /> <br />Once the base case studies were completed, alternative cases were run for each <br />utility. These cases allowed the model to select generic pumped storage unit(s) as an <br />alternative generation resource. The objective of the study was to provide a definitive <br />assessment of the economic potential of pumped storage development in the state <br />using a "representative" pumped storage plant. Therefore, no specific pumped <br />storage unit was analyzed. Instead, using industry data, the Electric Power Research <br />Institute (EPRI) Technical Assessment Guide, and data from the Bureau of <br />Reclamation files, characteristics of a generic pumped storage unit for the Colorado <br />area were assumed. These characteristics are listed in Table 2-5. <br /> <br />Table 2.5 <br /> <br />PumDed Storace Unit Assumptions <br /> <br />Unit Size(1) <br />Storage Size(1) <br />Storage Efficiency(2) <br />Capital Cost (3) <br /> <br />350 MW <br />10 hours <br />72% <br />$1 ,000/kW <br />(1987) <br /> <br />$3.4/kW-yr. <br />3.4 mills/kWh <br /> <br />Operation and Maintenance(1) <br />Fixed <br />Variable <br />Unit Availability(1) <br />Planned (Maintenance) <br />Unplanned (Forced Outage) <br /> <br />Unit Life(1) <br /> <br />5.3% <br />5.0% <br /> <br />50 years <br /> <br />(1) EPRI Technical Assessment Guide, Exhibit B.6-3B Conventional Pumped Hydro, 1986, p. <br />B-121. <br />(2) Technical Steering Committee Decision. <br />(3) The $1,000 is used as a starting cost only; the actual cost at which pumped storage begins <br />to replace other generating atternatives is calculated after the EGEAS runs. This cost could <br />be greater or less than a capttal cost of $1,000/kW. Capttal costs would include direct <br />construction costs, transmission costs, engineering, licensing, and administrative costs, <br />contingencies, and interest during construction. <br /> <br />2-10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.