My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Sterling 1996 WC Plan
CWCB
>
Water Conservation
>
Backfile
>
Sterling 1996 WC Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2011 4:16:03 PM
Creation date
9/30/2006 9:04:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Conservation
Project Type
Water Conservation Plan
Project Name
City of Sterling Water Conservation Plan
Title
Water Conservation Plan
Date
6/21/1996
County
Logan
Water Conservation - Doc Type
Complete Plan
Document Relationships
Sterling 1996 WCPlan Apprvl Ltr
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
Sterling 1996 WCPlan Proof of Publication
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
Sterling 1996 WCPlan WorkPlan
(Message)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />STERLING WATER CONSERVATION PLAN <br /> <br />MAY 28, 1996 <br /> <br />and their water usage patterns, in addition to the type of water-using fixtures and <br />appliances. It would also include the identification of any leaks, and the calculation of <br />the flow rale of showerheads and faucets and the loilel flush volumes. A <br />comprehensive audit would also include a fairly detailed analysis of the landscape <br />irrigation system, if existing. Residential water audits are offered as a free service by <br />dozens of utilities, particularly in California. This could be very time-consuming and <br />therefore expensive. It could be better to include this with public infonnation and <br />provide a self-audit for customers. <br /> <br />Measunt 6d - Offer landscape water-use audits to commercial customers: The <br />satisfactory completion of a thorough commercial/industrial audit requires a technical <br />understanding of that particular industry. For that reason, these audits are usually <br />pelfonned by consulting engineers, as opposed to being done by utility staffs. <br />Furthennore, a business may be more receptive to working directly with a consulting <br />engineer, rather than "the City". <br /> <br />Businesses will typically require, at least, a two or three year payback before they <br />would pay for the implementation of a water conservation measure. A several <br />thousand dollar fee for a consulting engineer to complete an audit only adds to the cost <br />that must be paid off by whatever measures are instituted. If the City were to offset <br />some of the consultanfs fee, it would offer an incentive to have the audit perfonned, <br />and the recommended strategies implemented. This would be very time-consuming <br />and therefore expensive. It could be better to include this with public infonnation and <br />provide a self-audit for customers. <br /> <br />Measure 6e - Offer commercial and residential leak detection DroGrams: The City <br />currently offers a limited leak detection by recording changes in water meter <br />measurements while all water apparatuses in the building are shut off. A more in depth <br />leak detection program would be very time-consuming and therefore a costly measure. <br /> <br />Measure 6f . DeveloD a voluntary water use el'fIc/encv ratina for homes: A <br />water-use efficiency rating program would consist of certified raters being paid by the <br />builder or homeowner to certify their home. The rating that they receive is a potential <br />marf<eting point for that builder or homeowner. The cost of administering a program for <br />water-use efficiency should not be taken lightly. Although there is at least one existing <br />water-use efficiency rating program being offered -by a municipality elsewhere in the <br />country, it is it novel enough of an idea that it has the potential to receive some grant <br />money for its development._un -__ _- un_u______~_________ __ _ _ u - - -- <br /> <br />However, one large, potential hurdle would be water use for landscape irrigation. There <br />are two aspects to this. First, landscaping is otten insta/leclaftet' the sale of a new <br />home, at least beyond a portion of turf area. Second, landscape irrigation practices are <br />quite variable, depending upon the skill and inclination of the homeowner. This is true <br />even given a specific landscaping with an inherent water requirement; the amount of <br />water required does not necessarily translate into the amount of water applied. <br /> <br />Time would be better spent on other measures with more impact. Calculating a <br />water-efficiency rating for landscape components of a home would be difficult. It is <br />doubtful how useful this would be for someone buying a home. <br /> <br />Measure 6a - Activelv Dublicize voluntary lawn waterinG restrictions: A time-of-day <br />lawn watering restriction has been imposed at other times in other cities, including <br />Greeley. This type of restriction can have one or both of the following objectives; (1) <br /> <br />Page48 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.