Laserfiche WebLink
<br />STERLING WATER CONSERVATION PLAN <br /> <br />MAY 28, 1996 <br /> <br />existing facilities, 2) nonnal extensions and improvements, and 3} major capital <br />improvements and replacements. <br /> <br />Generally, nonnal replacements and extensions and minor improvements are <br />financed from current revenues. These items nonnally indude transportation and <br />wor1< equipment such as trucks, automobiles, and mechanized-wor1< equipment; <br />small extensions to the collection system; office furniture and equipment; and other <br />recurring capital needs. SinCe these items are, in .most cases, non-recurring in <br />nature, the costs for these items can often be considered as a part of the debt <br />service coverage. <br /> <br />Major capital improvements, on the other hand, are typically funded through debt <br />frnancing. The need for and timing of major capital improvements are usually <br />detennined through the' development of a utility master plan and capital <br />improvement program. However, the City does not have a current master plan for <br />either the water or the sewer utilities. <br /> <br />In the absence of a capital improvement plan, the City adopted a policy in 1994 to <br />build up the reserve funds in anticipation of future capital improvement needs by <br />induding a capital recovery charge in the annual budget. One guide used by some <br />utilities (induding Sterling) for detennining the annual reserve contribution is the <br />annual depreciation of the system. For the Water Fund, the capital recovery charge <br />in the 1996 budget is $155,395 compared to the annual depreCiation on the system <br />of $140,129. <br /> <br />Water Fund: <br /> <br />The audits for the past four years and the estimated figures for 1995 indicate a <br />signiflC8llt variation in expenditures for capital improvements from year to year. In <br />1991, $38,672 was spent on capital improvements compared to $320,748 in 1993 <br />and $554,791 in 1995. The large expenditures are usually considered major capital <br />improvements and are not nonnally funded through the rates in a single year. The <br />capital expenditures induded in the 1996 budget and projected through 2001 are <br />$216,075. <br /> <br />Debt Payments: <br /> <br />_u__u____n - --- The annual debt service requirement consists of p,i"dpdl a"d illtEo,est /lIqui...III.."l$ <br />on outstanding bonds and loans, as well as any necessary obligations to debt <br />service reserves. At this time, the City's Water f(fndcfoeS/1ot have any outstanding <br />debts. <br /> <br />Annual Audits <br /> <br />Colorado law requires an annual audit of the City's accounting records by an inde- <br />pendent public accountant selected by City Council. The audit for the period ending <br />December 31, 1994 was perfonned by Lauer & Associates, P.C. As reported in the <br />1994 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, it was the auditor's opinion that "the <br />general purpose financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial <br />position of the City, as of December 31, 1994, and the results of its operations and <br /> <br />Page16 <br />