My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Sterling 1996 WC Plan
CWCB
>
Water Conservation
>
Backfile
>
Sterling 1996 WC Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2011 4:16:03 PM
Creation date
9/30/2006 9:04:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Conservation
Project Type
Water Conservation Plan
Project Name
City of Sterling Water Conservation Plan
Title
Water Conservation Plan
Date
6/21/1996
County
Logan
Water Conservation - Doc Type
Complete Plan
Document Relationships
Sterling 1996 WCPlan Apprvl Ltr
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
Sterling 1996 WCPlan Proof of Publication
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
Sterling 1996 WCPlan WorkPlan
(Message)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1 <br />\ <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />STERLING WATER CONSERVATION PLAN <br /> <br />MAY 28, 1996 <br /> <br />The City's previous plant investment fee schedule was based on the number of <br />residential units connected to the tap. For non-residential customers, the fee was <br />at a minimum of $1,000 with the provision that the actual fee be based on the <br />demand placed on the system. That left the decision up to the City staff as to how <br />much should be charged for each individual tap with little guidance other than <br />converting the estimated usage to a number of equivalent residential users. <br /> <br />Since the demand that can be placed on the system by an individual tap is directly <br />related to the size of the meter, the charge for larger taps was prorated based on <br />the capacity of the meter relative to the W meter as published by the American <br />Water Works Association (AWWA). With this arrangement, the City staff will have <br />to determine the size of meter required by referring to the fixture-unit method in the <br />Uniform Plumbing Code. Since the schedule of plant investment fees and the <br />determination of the meter size are both referenced to recognized standards, this <br />will reduce the amount of judgment required on the part of the staff and will reduce <br />the potential conflicts with developers and customers. <br /> <br />Water Rights Requirement: <br /> <br />Water rights must be permanently transferred to the City when land is annexed or <br />initiation of water service is requested. If there are no water rights or if they are <br />inadequate, a monetary equivalent shall be paid. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I Expenditures <br />- - - - - - -----Operating Costs: ___u_________ <br /> <br />Development Tap Charges: <br /> <br />Development Tap Charges are paid to the City for connecting a new tap to the <br />water main. New water customers pay for the cost of the water meter and its <br />installation and inspection at the time they get thei!iBuilding Permit. New customers <br />without existing water service to their lot, must pay for tapping the water main and <br />the corporation stop. For new subdivisions, the developer taps the main and <br />provides the corporation stop; and these charges are not paid to the City. The <br />charges reflect the actual cost to the City for labor and materials. <br /> <br />--~---- ----- ---~ --~ -- -- <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Operating costs include costs for operating and maintaining the water distribution <br />system, water treatment plant, general administration and t..msfers to the Generai <br />Fund of the City. For 1996, $620,000 has been budgeted for operation and <br />maintenance expenses; an increase of 3.9 percent over 1995 operation and <br />maintenance costs. <br /> <br />Capital Improvement Costs: <br /> <br />The source of funds for capital improvements and the establishment of the annual <br />cash requirement for future improvements or additions is a decision generally <br />affected by the nature of investment and utility financing policies. Capital <br />expenditures are generally classified into three broad categories: 1) replacement of <br /> <br />Page15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.