My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Weather Mod Critical Issues Report
CWCB
>
Water Conservation
>
Backfile
>
Weather Mod Critical Issues Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/28/2011 10:18:23 AM
Creation date
9/30/2006 9:03:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Conservation
Project Type
General OWC
Project Name
Weather Modification
Title
Critical Issues in Weather Modification Research
Date
1/1/2004
Water Conservation - Doc Type
Final Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />information has been found very useful in the design of ground-based mountain area <br />seeding projects, <br /> <br />5) Latest state-of-the-art remote sensing systems are a basic requirement for <br />conducting successful snowpack augmentation programs. They can locate and measure <br />in real time the distributions of cloud water and ice as well as wind flow patterns related <br />to seeding aerosol transport. The wind profiler, the dual-channel microwave radiometer <br />and the polarimetric radar have found substantial use in specific snowpack augmentation <br />programs in Nevada, California, Utah and Arizona prior to 1995, <br /> <br />3.2.4 Additional evidence of wintertime cloud seeding effectiveness <br /> <br />There is a broad body of evidence in the literature and in company reports <br />describing the results from various operational projects involving winter orographic <br />clouds. Some projects in California have been in existence from the 1950's and 1960's. <br />The Kings River project in southern California has been operational for 48 years and has <br />produced an average 5.5% additional runoff per year (Henderson, 1986, 2003). An <br />operational project run for the past 25 years or so in Utah has published results for 13 and <br />19 years of operations that indicate 11-15% increases in seasonal precipitation (Griffith et <br />aI., 1991; Griffith et ai, 1997). Add to these results the San Joaquin River project <br />showing at a minimum 8% increase in target area seasonal precipitation using trace <br />chemistry studies of snow pack (McGurty, 1999), the Climax project indications of 10% <br />increases, and the Tasmanian results of 10% increases in seasonal precipitation when <br />storm cloud top temperatures are in the range of _100C to -120C and the evidence <br />becomes very convincing that cloud seeding conducted under proper conditions increases <br />precipitation in winter orographic situations, These findings and statements are in accord <br />with the American Meteorological Society policy statement on weather modification <br />regarding capabilities of winter orographic cloud seeding (AMS, 1998). <br /> <br />Most of the evaluations have utilized target-control regression techniques or <br />snowcourse water content and precipitation storage data. Most of the evaluations of <br />long-duration projects have provided evidence of increases in streamflow amounting to 5 <br />to 10 percent of the natural flow (NRC 1966, 1973). More recent evaluations using <br />precipitation or snow water content information have shown increases in the 10-15% <br />range (Griffith et aI., 1991). Conversion of these increases in precipitation into <br />streamflow indicates increases in streamflow on the order of 10% (Stauffer, 200 I), The <br />consistency of results is encouraging. <br /> <br />Statisticians have questioned the validity of p-values obtained from sets of non- <br />randomized data. Of particular concern is the fact that the seeded and non-seeded cases <br />are drawn from different historical periods, instead of being interspersed in a random <br />fashion. Gabriel and Petrondas (1983) have investigated this point with actual rainfall <br />data, and confirmed that p-values from evaluations of non-randomized projects need to <br />be adjusted for such effects, but not to the extent that the analyses are rendered invalid. <br />Considering the hundreds of project-seasons of data that are now available, it appears that <br />the latest NRC report should have confirmed, and even extended, the encouraging <br /> <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.