Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />3.2.3 Additional research accomplishments; static seeding of winter <br />orographic clouds <br /> <br />I) One of the most exciting accompl ishments in recent snowpack <br />augmentation research is the establishment of the direct link between the seeding activity <br />and the water reaching the ground in the form of snow. The mm/hr increases in <br />precipitation caused by silver iodide seeding have been documented several times in the <br />reviewed scientific literature between 1988 and 1999, The link has been established by <br />physical and chemical techniques. The snow precipitated at particular targeted sites is <br />connected directly to the seeding material and to concurrently released chemical tracers <br />in that snow. The big advantage of snowpack work is that the scientists are dealing with <br />solid-state precipitation that can be sampled during and after storm events and stored in <br />the frozen state until analyzed. The methodologies used to establish this direct linkage <br />have been described by Warburton et al. (1985, 1994, and I 995a,b) Super and Heimbach <br />(1992), Chai et al. (1993), Stone and Huggins (1996), Super and Holroyd (1997), and <br />McGurty (1999). <br /> <br />2) A second significant accomplishment in the snowpack augmentation <br />studies provides a chemical explanation for the apparent failure of some larger scale <br />randomized seeding experiments to achieve statistically significant increases in <br />precipitation. Warburton et al. (1995b) have shown that, on the average, only 20% of the <br />snow, which precipitated to the ground during the seeded periods of the Sierra Nevada <br />Truckee- Tahoe project, showed evidence of being impacted by the silver iodide seeding. <br />The results indicate that it would be necessary to produce very substantial changes in the <br />limited areas where seeding material is detected, to yield a statistically acceptable change <br />over the entire snowfall target area, Further studies of this type were conducted by Stone <br />and Warburton (1989) in other Sierra Nevada regions seeded from ground-based aerosol <br />generators, <br /> <br />3) Current physical and chemical evidence for these two significant <br />accomplishments comes from research projects in the northern and southern Sierra <br />Nevada and the Carson and Wasatch ranges of California, Nevada and Utah. Dual- <br />channel microwave radiometers, short wavelength radars, ice-nuclei counters, sulfur <br />hexafluoride gas and combinations of ice nucleating and non ice-nucleating aerosols <br />(silver iodide and indium sesquioxide), have enabled scientists to identify the locations <br />and the quantities of supercooled liquid water in winter storms and to track the seeding <br />aerosols from their points of release to the targeted snowfall sites, as noted above. <br /> <br />4) The locations within winter storm clouds where ice-phase water capture <br />occur have been studied by Warburton and DeFelice (1986) and by Warburton, et al. <br />(1993). These studies and others in the Sierra Nevada and in the Australian Alps showed <br />for the first time that the stable oxygen and hydrogen isotopic composition of ice-phase <br />precipitation are related to the microphysical processes within the clouds in which the <br />precipitation has formed. The work demonstrated that when orography dominated during <br />the post-frontal storm period, the ice-phase water substance was being captured in the <br />clouds between -50C and -140C with a peak around -lloC temperature. This type of <br /> <br />18 <br />