Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />(1986), Such suggestions from exploratory analyses should not be considered absolute <br />proof by themselves. However, these particular experiments used high elevation Agl <br />generators, a seeding approach which has been shown to routinely result in transport and <br />dispersion of Agl plumes into the SL W zone, Moreover, both experiments have <br />considerable supporting physical evidence in agreement with the statistical suggestions. <br />Some physical evidence was collected during the BRE (Super, 1974; Super and <br />Heimbach, 1983) and some later by cloud physics aircraft (Super and Heimbach, 1988). <br />Convincing physical evidence, based on trace chemistry analysis of snowfall, was <br />reported for the Lake Almanor target well after the randomized experiment, as reported <br />by Chai et al. (1993) and Warburton et al. (1995a,b). The results of Warburton et al. <br />(1995a) are in particularly good agreement with earlier statistical suggestions of seeding <br />success with cold westerly flow, and further demonstrated that failure to produce positive <br />statistical results with southerly flow cases was likely related to seeding affecting control <br />stations (mis-targeting). Both experiments had evidence suggesting that the <br />condensation-freezing mechanism resulted in the formation of high seeding crystal <br />concentrations just downwind of the generators. This mechanism (Finnegan and Pitter, <br />1988) was not understood at the time of the experiments, but may have been a major <br />factor in their promising results when AgI was released directly in-cloud at temperatures <br />less than _60C. Both experiments had evidence of the largest increases in snowfall within <br />about 12 miles ofthe generators, and for colder cloud temperatures. The panel is <br />unaware of other winter orographic randomized experiments from the western U.S. that <br />have both strong statistical suggestions and considerable physical evidence to support <br />those suggestions. According to the review by Reynolds (1988), only the Bridger Range <br />Experiment had such dual evidence at that time. <br /> <br />These two randomized experiments strongly suggest that higher elevation seeding <br />in mountainous terrain can produce meaningful seasonal snowfall increases. These <br />suggestions are based on both statistical and physical evidence, Although the <br />experiments were run decades ago, they are still worth reviewing in the absence of more <br />or equally impressive results from the limited number of more recent randomized winter <br />orographic cloud seeding experiments. <br /> <br />The studies of Warburton and Wetzel (1992), Warburton, et al. (1995a), and <br />Super and Holroyd (1997) are pertinent. The Warburton and Wetzel paper showed how <br />8mm wavelength radar was used in conjunction with microwave radiometer <br />measurements for assessing snowfall augmentation potential. The second paper reported <br />on studies in Lake Almanor regarding the targeting and tracking of silver iodide in the <br />precipitation which demonstrated that the transport and dispersion problems are <br />significant and can lead to a much weakened capability of detecting seeding effects by <br />precipitation statistics, The work of Super and Holroyd showed marked increases in ice <br />particle concentrations produced by cloud seeding in Utah. <br /> <br />17 <br />