Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />conclusions presented in previous reviews, rather than retreat to the position that it is <br />premature to conduct operational projects. <br /> <br />3.2.5 Primary concerns in winter orographic programs <br /> <br />(a) Transport and Dispersion: One of the most significant uncertainties in larger <br />scale seeding projects is the transport and dispersion ofthc seeding aerosols across the <br />project areas, Results from several studies have revealed that most of the precipitation <br />falling in the targets during seeded periods has not been impacted by the seeding process, <br />assuming that the absence of the seeding chemical in the snowfall can be used for making <br />such a deduction. New fully automated ground-based generators can be located in often <br />not very accessible locations in the higher terrain of mountains thus reducing the <br />problems of getting seeding materials into targets. Trace gases can also be used to track <br />the seeding material through the target and if it occurs through the control areas. <br /> <br />(b) Remote Sensing: Although the wind profiler, the dual-channel microwave <br />radiometer and the polarimetric radar and other short wavelength radars have found <br />substantial use in specific snowpack programs prior to 1995, it is unfortunate that very <br />few of these devices are available to the scientific or weather modification community <br />outside of government agencies. There is a great need for resources and actual <br />construction of such apparatus for new scientific research efforts. <br /> <br />(c) Statistical Analysis Methods: Because of the opportunity to shift the design <br />of larger-scale seeding experiments to the use of physical and chemical assessment <br />methods and to continue to satisfy the requirement of unbiased randomization, there is <br />now a special need for new statistical approaches that are coupled with physical <br />observations enabling comparisons to be made between those portions of the snowpack <br />which have been impacted by the seeding during a seeding period and those which have <br />not. For example, can snow samples that contain no seeding materials be considered as a <br />"no-seed" comparison set? <br /> <br />(d) Trace Chemical Facilities: It will be essential to ensure that adequate trace <br />chemical laboratories are available for analyzing the snowfall for silver, indium, cesium <br />and other tracer materials used in these snowpack augmentation studies. A few such <br />laboratories do exist in the V.S, most of which have not been involved in weather <br />modification. <br /> <br />(e) Environmental Impacts of Cloud Seeding Programs: Nearly all orographic <br />weather modification programs in the western V,S. involve public lands, All agencies <br />both governmental and private that engage in these weather modification programs are <br />confronted from time to time by concerned citizens and environmental groups with <br />questions about the environmental impacts of weather modification and the chemicals <br />used in these programs. In cases where seeding aerosol generators are to be located on <br />public lands, the land manager (e.g" V .S. F orest Service) is required to issue an <br />environmental assessment and negative declaration prior to issuing special use permits <br />for generator sites, Public agencies such as municipal utility districts, and state water <br /> <br />20 <br />