My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Castle Rock Teach by Example Final Report
CWCB
>
Water Conservation
>
Backfile
>
Castle Rock Teach by Example Final Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2011 3:13:03 PM
Creation date
9/30/2006 9:03:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Conservation
Project Type
Ag/Muni Grant
Contract/PO #
C153616
Applicant
Town of Castle Rock
Project Name
"Teach by Example" - Water Conservation Make Over at Three Homes
Title
"Teach By Example" Program Final Report
Date
6/1/1995
County
Douglas
Water Conservation - Doc Type
Final Report
Document Relationships
Castle Rock Teach by Example Application
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
Castle Rock Teach by Example Contract
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
Castle Rock Teach by Example Letter
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
Castle Rock Teach By Example Prog Report
(Message)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
Castle Rock Teach By Example WorkPlan
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />TOWN OF CASTLE ROCK <br />"Teach By Example" Program Summary <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />Castle Rock's water rates are on an increasing rate scale. The lower rate of $1.00/ <br />thousand gallons was used in interior calculations, and $1.50/thousand gallons for exterior <br />calculations. Interior usage fell within the first tier, while exterior consumption usually <br />pushes rates into the second tier. <br /> <br />INTERIOR <br /> <br />Each installed interior retrofit device was critiqued by the homeowners and tracked <br />to specific water savings. The items installed were showerhead, ultra low volume toilets, <br />faucet aerators, and front loading clothes washers. The cost/benefit analysis revealed that <br />dollar for dollar, one of the smallest investments yields the biggest proportionate savings. <br />The cost of the 3 gpm showerhead averaged $11.70/ fixture. Savings/cost ratios on these <br />were between 47 - 165% at the Hargrove and Hopkins households. A simple tip we <br />discovered, the longer you or your teenagers shower the sooner this investment will pay for <br />itself, (between just under a year to just over two years). And our homeowners were <br />satisfied and even surprised with the performance of the lower flow showerhead. <br /> <br />The ultra low volume toilets reflected a consistent savings/cost ratio of between 10- <br />19%. At a cost of around $120, the toilet will pay for itself in water savings in five to eight <br />years. One thing to note is that by ordinance in 1990, the Town of Castle Rock's building <br />code required installation of ULV's (1.6 or less gallons per flush) and low flow showerhead <br />(3 or less gallons per minute) in all new construction. <br /> <br />The toilets had an acceptable satisfaction record. We did have to replace one toilet. <br />Ray Roman, of Rock Plumbing returned to the Foxfield location several times, free of charge, <br />to remedy a problem with this temperamental leaking toilet that finally had to be replaced. <br />This program was full of lessons, and here was one of the first, but definitely not the last. <br />Sears had a local catalogue store, from which we received very good prices on toilets and <br />clothes washers. However, we discovered that warranties were not honored unless <br />installation was accomplished by Sears personnel. 50 the problem toilet, a Universal Rundle <br />1.5 gallon unit, was replaced by a Mansfield 1.6 gpf ULV outside of any warranty <br />conditions. No problems were experienced with the new unit. <br /> <br />Homeowners still understood the importance ofthe use ofthe UL V's, and their water <br />saving impact. The Hargroves actually reflected an increased interior water consumption. <br />They noted that this was due to potty training, and dreaded what consumption would have <br />been without the ULV's. <br /> <br />The front loading horizontal axis clothes washer was an interior retrofit item with <br />some trepidation, on the part of the homeowner's and staff as well. The information about <br />the performance of these washers was very positive, but we were changing a real icon of <br />!. the American household. These washers were installed at the Hopkins and Nettles <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.