My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ArkValley Irrigation Grant Final Report
CWCB
>
Water Conservation
>
Backfile
>
ArkValley Irrigation Grant Final Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2011 3:47:47 PM
Creation date
9/30/2006 9:02:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Conservation
Project Type
Ag/Muni Grant
Applicant
Colorado State University Cooperative Extensions
Project Name
Improvement of Irrigation Technology in Arkansas River Valley
Title
Demonstrations of Irrigation Technology to Improve Crop Yields, Returns and Water Quality in the Arkansas River Valley of Colorado Summary and Conclusions
County
Larimer
Water Conservation - Doc Type
Final Report
Document Relationships
ArkValley Irrigation Grant Applic
(Message)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
ArkValley Irrigation Grant Prog Report
(Message)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
ArkValley Irrigation Grant SOW
(Message)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />for each plant species by periodic weighing of pots. Water treatment was applied in a partially <br />subsurface perforated containers to avoid direct contact between foliage and irrigation water <br />(plants can absorb salts through the leaves). Leaching was kept to a minimum. Plants were <br />planted by seed 2 cm below soil surfaces, grown in a temperature-controlled greenhouse using a <br />24:!:20C day/night temperature regime with an average photon flux density of 400 Jimol m"s-l. <br /> <br />Tall fescue was initially clipped 60 days after planting and then clipped in 20-30 day intervals. <br />Final harvest was 35 days after previous clipping. Both types of birds foot trefoil were initially <br />clipped 120 days after planting and then clipped in 30-35 intervals. Clipping "four" for birdsfoot <br />trefoil was conducted =50 days after previous clipping. Clipping interval regimes were <br />subjectively determined based on visual regrowth, on or about in 30 day intervals, when possible <br />for all species. Generally, clipping was perfonned to an approximate height of 10 cm above soil <br />surface. Plant material was processed at a future date. Approximately 317 days after planting, all <br />plant species were completely harvested 2 cm above the soil surface. Harvested and clipped plant <br />material was oven-dried at 50oC, dry matter (DM) yield recorded, and then ground in a Wiley <br />mill. Plant sub-samples were taken and then wet-acid digested and analyzed for Ca2+, Mg2+, and <br />Na+ by the inductively coupled plasma spectometry. Additional plant sub-samples were extracted <br />with 2% acetic acid and tissue Cl" concentrations were determined potentiometrically, Composite <br />soil samples were made from all replications within each treatment for each species and soil EC <br />(electrical conductivity in dS mol), pH, and soluble Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, and Cl- concentrations were <br />determined at preplant and postharvest from a saturated soil paste. <br /> <br />Results <br /> <br />General observations <br />Tall fescue thrived and outperfonned both varieties of birds foot trefoil under the test conditions, <br />irrespective of treatment. Narrow-Ieafbirdsfoot trefoil appeared to grow and look better than the <br />broad-Jeaftrefoil under poor growing conditions (i.e., bad soil, poor irrigation water). Salt <br />toxicity symptoms (burning of the leaf margins) and stunting of growth began to appear in all <br />three species shortly after applying "poor If' quality water. <br /> <br />- <br />- <br /> <br />Biomass <br />Tall fescue was clipped ten times throughout the designated growing season, while narrow-and <br />broad-leaf birdsfoot trefoil were clipped six times. Generally, height of all plant species were <br />highest for the following at each clipping: treatments 1>4>2 (data not shown). Individual DM for <br />each clipping and total DM are presented in Table 3 and 4 for all species; a histogram overview of <br />DM production is shown in Figure 1, 2 and 3 for all plant species (final clipping or harvest was <br />higher in on Figures], 2 and 3 because each plant species was clipped to within 2 cm of the soil <br />surface). Tall fescue produced more DM than both varieties of birds foot trefoil at any treatment <br />and did not experience significant decreases in DM among the treatments. Narrow-leafbirdsfoot <br />produced more biomass than broad-Ieafbirdsfoot at any treatment. Moreover, the DM yield <br />appears to be stimulated in narrow-leaf by either "poor" quality water or "poor" quality soil. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.