Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Evaluating the Ability of Three Forage Species to <br />Tolerate High Saline Conditions in Colorado. <br /> <br />Objective <br /> <br />The objective of this study is to compare biomass production and chloride accumulation of <br />different forage species, e.g., birdsfoot trefoil and tall fescue, grown under simulated saline soil <br />c9nditions found at specific sites in Colorado. <br /> <br />Methods and Materials <br /> <br />Salt tolerance, biomass production, and (Cl") accumulation by selected plant species were <br />evaluated from September 27, 1997 to August 12, 1998, under greenhouse conditions in Fresno, <br />California. The plant species were as follows: broad-leafbirdsfoot trefoil (Lotus comiculatus cv. <br />Steadfast), narrow-Jeafbirdsfoot trefoil (Lotl/s glaber cv. HMB), and tall fescue (Festuca <br />anmdinacea cv. Au Triumph). <br /> <br />The experimental design was a completely randomized block with six replications for each <br />treatment for each of the three species. There were a total of 120 pots used for the greenhouse <br />study. Eighteen liter pots were filled with approximately 10 kg of either "good" or "poor" soil <br />(typical soils of Colorado regions under consideration to poor quality water as a source of <br />irrigation; See Table I for soil characteristics for both soils.) <br /> <br />Treatments were as follows for each plant species: <br /> <br />Treatment I - <br />" 2 <br />" 3- <br />u 4- <br />" 5- <br /> <br />" 6 <br /> <br />Good soil, good quality irrigation water <br />Good soil, medium quality irrigation water <br />Good soil, poor quality irrigation water <br />Poor soil, good quality irrigation water <br />Poor soil, medium quality irrigation water <br />Poor soil, poor quality irrigation water <br /> <br />See Table 2 for selected chemical parameters for irrigation waters used in study. Treatments <br />receiving poor quality water received additional salinity with poor II water quality 45 d before <br />termination of study; see Table 2 for composition of this water. <br /> <br />All types of irrigation water were synthetically constructed based on analysis from Colorado water <br />samples sent to the Water Management Research Laboratory (WMRL) from Pueblo River- <br />"good quality water"; Pueblo water well - "medium quality water"; and Arkansas River - "poor <br />quality water"; poor II quality wate~ was based on a saltier composition from the Arkansas River. <br />Amounts of water to irrigate were based upon approximated evapotranspiration losses determined <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />