My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ArkValley Irrigation Grant Final Report
CWCB
>
Water Conservation
>
Backfile
>
ArkValley Irrigation Grant Final Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2011 3:47:47 PM
Creation date
9/30/2006 9:02:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Conservation
Project Type
Ag/Muni Grant
Applicant
Colorado State University Cooperative Extensions
Project Name
Improvement of Irrigation Technology in Arkansas River Valley
Title
Demonstrations of Irrigation Technology to Improve Crop Yields, Returns and Water Quality in the Arkansas River Valley of Colorado Summary and Conclusions
County
Larimer
Water Conservation - Doc Type
Final Report
Document Relationships
ArkValley Irrigation Grant Applic
(Message)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
ArkValley Irrigation Grant Prog Report
(Message)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
ArkValley Irrigation Grant SOW
(Message)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Elemental Concentrations <br />Tall fescue accumulated the greatest amount ofCI- and Na+. Broad-Ieafbirdsfoot accumulated <br />the greatest amount of Ca2+ and Mg2+ among the three species. Generally tissue Ca2+ <br />concentrations were higher in treatments 1 thru 3 (good soil) than treatments 4 thru 6 (poor soil) <br />for all species, while Na+ and CI- concentrations increased in shoot tissue in treatments 4 thru 6 <br />(Table 5 and 6). Generally, soil EC levels and all tested elements increased with addition of poor <br />quality water. Interesting to note; soil EC did not increase to the same magnitude in postharvest <br />soils from tall fescue as compared to both varieties of birds foot trefoil (see Table I). <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />Based upon the conditions described and presented by Colorado State University Extension, tall <br />fescue appeared to tolerate the poor soil and poor quality water conditions better than narrow and <br />broad-leafbirdsfoot trefoiL <br /> <br />Plant tolerance to salinity is usually appraised in one of three ways: I) the ability ofa plant to <br />survive on saline soils, 2) the absolute plant growth or yield, and 3) the relative growth or yield on <br />saline soil or with saline water compared with that on nonsaline conditions. In this study, the <br />third point of criteria was primarily used for determining salt tolerance. Salinity can affect plants <br />at all stages of development, but sensitivity sometimes varies from one grov,'!h stage to the next. <br />Tall fescue did not appear to show significant decreases in dry matter production among the <br />different treatments at any clipping, although DM gradually increased to a point in its growth <br />cycle and then gradually decreased. For both narrow- and broad-Ieafbirdsfoot; significant DM <br />differences among the treatments were easier to detect. Interestingly, treatments containing either <br />poor soil or poor quality water slightly stimulated DM production in both varieties of birds foot, <br />especially in narrow-leaf The influence of clipping frequency or interval regime on biomass <br />production was not evaluated in this study, but likely influences growth of tall fescue and <br />birdsfoot trefoiL <br /> <br />Current evidence indicates that, in general, plant growth of any plant is most closely related to <br />water uptake. We found this relationship to be true in our study. During our designated growing <br />season, tall fescue received up to 27 liters of water per pot, while both varieties of birds foot <br />trefoil received approximately 20 liters, irrespective of treatments. Consequently, total dry matter <br />yields were considerably greater for tall fescue. Care was taken with irrigation to avoid contact <br />with plant and water applications. This precaution allowed for a more accurate evaluation to be <br />made on the species ability to accumulate ions through their roots, since plants can absorb ions <br />directly through their leaves. <br /> <br />Changes and differences in shoot ion concentrations with salinity treatments could be observed in <br />the three species, Generally leaves are susceptible to injury by the toxic accumulation of CI", or <br />Na-, or both in the leaves. Injury may depend more on leaf characteristics and the leaves' rate of <br />absorption than on a plant's tolerance to soil salinity. Rates of salt absorptions may increase when <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.