My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Loveland 1996 WC Plan
CWCB
>
Water Conservation
>
Backfile
>
Loveland 1996 WC Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/18/2011 12:15:28 PM
Creation date
9/30/2006 9:02:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Conservation
Project Type
Water Conservation Plan
Project Name
City of Loveland Water Conservation Plan
Title
Water Conservation Plan
Date
5/1/1996
County
Larimer
Water Conservation - Doc Type
Complete Plan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~~ <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />-I <br />I <br /> <br />-I <br />I <br /> <br />-I <br />I <br /> <br />j <br /> <br />Section 3 <br /> <br />UTILITY ECONOMICS <br /> <br />Utility Finances <br /> <br />In 1995, Water and Power concluded the 1995 Ulility Rate and System Impact Fee Study <br />to determine appropriate rates and fees for water, wastewater and stormwater service. The <br />study used cost-of-service principles to evaluate required rate adjustments for each customer <br />class. The recommended rates have been adopted and are projected to be sufficient to meet <br />fiscal obligations. According to the study, the following goals were used in setting rates: <br /> <br />. Rates should be reasonable with each customer paying an equitable share of costs. <br /> <br />. Rates should be sufficient to maintain high quality drinking water and to treat and dis- <br />pose of wastewater in an environmentally sound and cost-effective manner. <br /> <br />. Funding should be sufficient to meet revenue requirements during the rate period and <br />capital facilities necessary for growth should be funded from system impact fees. <br /> <br />. Rates should be sufficient to meet revenue requirements and bond covenants, <br /> <br />Revenue <br /> <br />Revenue for water funds are derived from the sale of water, system impact fees, excess <br />use surcharges and interest income. Of$9,029,191 in 1994 revenue, $6,352,014 came from <br />the sale of water, $701,377 from interest and $1,975,800 from other revenue sources. Reve- <br />nues in 1996 are projected to be $8,682,800. <br /> <br />Water Rates <br /> <br />The way customers have been charged for water has gone through many changes <br />in the past 100 years. In the years before the City supplied water, an enterprising busi- <br />nessman charged 25 cents for a whiskey barrel of untreated water. In 1887, the Water <br />Utility was established and charged an annual flat rate, based on the type of dwelling <br />and the number of fixtures. For a home with five rooms or less, the rate was $12. <br />Each toilet and bathtub in the house carried an additional $2 fee. For a barber shop or <br />blacksmith shop, the rate was $10 per year, To keep one horse, cow or other animal <br />for private use, the fee was $2 per year and additional animals were only $1 a head. <br /> <br />Until 1968, rates were based on a flat fee determined by fixture count, but keep- <br />ing track of the number of bathrooms and toilet fixtures in homes was difficult. In <br />July 1968, the City developed a flat rate charge per family based on average water us- <br />age, and a charge for lawn watering based on lot size, A big change occurred in 1981 <br />when monthly bills began reflecting actual water use with the installation of meters. <br />A water bill has an account charge and a consumption charge. Loveland has a uni- <br /> <br />May 1996 <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />Water Conservation Plan <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.