Laserfiche WebLink
m <br /> v <br /> O <br /> 20 O <br /> n <br /> D <br /> Denver. <br /> z <br /> CHAIRMAN DER: Do you attribute the delay to failure <br /> on the part of the Corps of Engineers to not promptly, or was <br /> it due to the failure of the Corps of Engineers to receive <br /> directions promptly/ <br /> MR. KENDEKRAZ4t We feel it is attributable to the fact <br /> that the Corps of Engineers did not receive the requests <br /> promptly. <br /> CHAIRMAN MAKER; I think that covers the situation for <br /> our purposes. <br /> H. LEAVITT: I would make this observation regarding <br /> the operation and the flow of waters from John I[artin Reser- <br /> voir. In the year 1948 it was very evident from the experience <br /> which I had noted that one of the main problems raging the <br /> water users of both states is becoming a matter of education <br /> as to the proper method of handling these waters without <br /> waste and without detriment to the lands that are being irri- <br /> gated. It this is not done, both the users in Kansas and <br /> Colorado are going to find themselves in difficult positions <br /> as regards oonditions on certain lands under those ditches. <br /> CHAIRMAN S:R: Is there any other comment with respect <br /> to the report from Mr. Levitt and Mr. Mendenhall on the • <br />