Laserfiche WebLink
m <br /> v <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> c <br /> 38 <br /> MR. TATE: I think we ought to limit the wording of <br /> that last sentence so that it will read "water carried <br /> across the Btateline through said canal. " That is the <br /> 0 <br /> only one involved. That would get away from the possi— <br /> bility of any claim of ownership by reason of purchase; <br /> in other words, be clear of that. �. <br /> MR. IRELAND: By change of grades.from-time to time. <br /> There might be another change. <br /> CHAIRMAN KRAMER: As I recall our previous considera- <br /> tion of that point, it was this, that it was physically <br /> conceivable that there might be other canals, although <br /> that possibility probably was very remote. However, the <br /> opinion was also voiced that it would be undesirable to <br /> express in compact language a restrietion: •or limitation, <br /> v I i V+ 0 } G <br /> that you might in a sense call pdnotuation with certain <br /> particular wording, and that the language would be more <br /> palatable and be just as effective if it were put in the <br /> plural rather than in the specific single. <br /> MR. IRELAND: We might say whether carried across the <br /> Stateline through this or any other suoh canal, instead <br /> of the word "this. " <br /> CHAIRMAN KRAMER: I will offer this amendment for the <br /> record, that the second sentence read, "whether carried <br /> • <br />