Laserfiche WebLink
m <br /> v <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> �y <br /> 3 <br /> O <br /> a very responsive note with me to be oonsistent in our <br /> language instead of just using the blanket word water in <br /> this Article VI—B, to use the term that we define, so that <br /> 0 <br /> the Article would say, <br /> "Article VI—B. Inasmuch as the Frontier Canal 70 <br /> diverts waters of the Arkansas River west of the Stateline m <br /> N <br /> at a point in Colorado for irrigation uses in Kansas only, <br /> Colorado concedes to Kansas and 'entail aseusee exclusive <br /> administrative control over the operation of Frontier <br /> Canal and its headworks for such purposes, to the sate <br /> extent as though said works were located entirely within <br /> the State of Kansas." <br /> The second sentence of that paragraph would remain <br /> unchanged. "The water (this use of the word water is <br /> entirely proper because we are speaking nowof the <br /> measurable entity of the water) whether carried across <br /> the Stateline through any such canal shall be considered <br /> to be part of the Stateline flow as apportioned under this <br /> Compact." <br /> It strikes me with that modification of the language, <br /> and making the term water of the Arkansas River consistent <br /> with our definition of the term throughout this Compact, <br /> that we probably clarify this point adequately. But it <br /> is not for me to be the judge of Kansas' interests in the <br /> interpretation. <br />