Laserfiche WebLink
27 <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> m <br /> 0 <br /> ourselves now on a compact, <br /> MR. IRELAND: No, I don' t think we want to commit <br /> ourselves to the final words of the compact. I think we 0 <br /> all get the idea of it. <br /> MR. TATE: That was the basis of my suggestion a <br /> while ago that whatever terms we finally adopt for compact <br /> purposes should be fully and definitely explained or defined <br /> so that a third party who never had heard of water, other <br /> than tap water, would know what we meant by native water or <br /> foreign water, as we might suggest. <br /> Now, I think this is just for our own use here, as I <br /> understand it, in these preliminary studies. <br /> I would second that motion, as amended. <br /> CHAIRMAN KRAMER: Motion has been made and seconded. <br /> Is there any further discussion going to that motion? <br /> MR. PATTERSON: I want to offer a comment about it, <br /> that I still don' t get George' s distinction, although the <br /> word "foreign" water is underscored, as to what is meant. <br /> °Native" is described in the definition as water that has <br /> its source in and is imported by diversion from a watershed <br /> other than the Arkansas River watershed. <br /> CHAIRMAN KRAMER: When Mr.. Knapp made that comment <br /> I think foreign and imported are synonymous terms. <br /> MR. PATTERSON: I certainly will not agree to any <br /> change of all of the titles we have prepared that are label- <br />