Laserfiche WebLink
m <br /> U <br /> 12 <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> n <br /> r: 1 r �. A l ng the <br /> w�bA'�E a rerqus.�t C102�C>F�< ,i...fl� a s,a�eiblr r���,.,.�ti Of <br /> remark that he and Mr. .Dixon made at our westing. <br /> jE cl:MAN K LR: I would like to clarify that a <br /> moment so there will be no connection drawn between that and Z <br /> tut& subject of language for the Compact, as I thought I had <br /> informed the Commission. I took it upon my9self when I tramp. <br /> mi tted th transcript to Mr. Dixon and to Mr. Debler long be- <br /> fore any language was submitted and offered them the opportu- <br /> nity to .make corrections, it being evident to Ste as it. would <br /> I think to any other person rending that transcript, that it <br /> ;,uct!fied correction for the purposes of permanent record. <br /> Properly, in fact, it seems to me that correction is being <br /> coordinated between the two primary people who participated <br /> ers. Of course, you are entitled to your own interpretation, <br /> but to we that is quite A zeparatee matter from the submittal <br /> of Compact language. That is purely a procedural aepeet. <br /> t PATiERSO ; Do I un6eretend that the j aregraph sub'* <br /> , i tt e -or Mr. Debler has been submitted to and approved by the <br /> C omu:i z a toner of 2?ee iaaation and the secretary of the Interior <br /> before he submitted it, <br /> i4:1. V I-DAL: N . <br /> C1.A1I1XAN KR1 MER: The correspondence which I submitted <br /> ant which had been previously furnished, I think is quite clear <br /> on that, that Mr. Debler' a submittal of language has been re- <br /> v.iewe ty the office of the Cam: iesioner, and as the result of <br />