Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br /> v <br /> 1 0 <br /> 0 <br /> n <br /> m <br /> 0 <br /> on the subject, the Interstate Ccami,eEioA here pass the matte- <br /> H <br /> ter over. oeoond., that insofar as any proposed importation <br /> or tre.nsaountain diversion project is concerned, it is beyond <br /> 0 <br /> the purpose of our Comm:Winn to sake provision as to the <br /> effect of any such project. Or, third, that us take no no- <br /> tion in the matter whatsoever. m <br /> 0 <br /> However, the Qoisnittee considered that in view of <br /> ae urteey due to the Deportment of the Interior and The Durum <br /> of iteelamation, and considering Kr. Straus' letter of Kay 22d, <br /> we should give consideration to whether we should extend to <br /> him., and concurrently of course to Kr. Debler and Kr. Dixon, <br /> an invitatio a to meet with our Commission for final definite <br /> notion on the matter under coneeideration. And that perhaps <br /> it would be well to consider also the advisability of notify- <br /> ing the Corps of Engineers and the war Department of the <br /> misting and what we expect to consider, and get their views on <br /> the subject. <br /> (Die suasion off the record. ) <br /> CHAIRMAN KR AMER: 1 take it of the three alternative <br /> courses of action which your Coaaâ–ºittee has considered, that <br /> your specific reeoommendhtion to the Commission is the adoption <br /> of the first course; namely, holding this matter in abeyance <br /> until resubmittal of language is made from the office of the <br /> Commissioner of Reclamation. <br /> KR. VIDAL: Well, yes, particularly in view of what <br /> developed yesterday afternoon, your statement as to Mr. <br />