Laserfiche WebLink
m <br /> 13 0 <br /> 0 <br /> C) <br /> tat review the office of the Commissioner feels that language <br /> in not satiefactory, and the Commissioner requested that we <br /> frl <br /> not oonsider that but await his submittal of whet his office <br /> con£?ii.4ers to be sa.tisfaotory language. So, in effect, Mr. <br /> Dealer' s submittal has been withdrawn. <br /> MR. PATTE ON t May I ask, Hr. Vidal, aid you consider m <br /> w <br /> anything other than Mr. nobler' s submitted paragraph? Did <br /> you oonsider the comments that he has t*jeeted into the record, <br /> both as a representative of the Department of the Interior and <br /> as an individual? <br /> MIL VIDAL: I said that we considered possibly--I won' t <br /> cell them °alternativee provisions or clauses for Compact, <br /> but "iubstitute" clauses, and we were unable to agree fundamen- <br /> tally as to ? tether, first, we ought to have any clause on <br /> the subject, or, second, as to the language or any clause we <br /> could Consider. <br /> We did consider, however, that while we might recommend <br /> that we say nothing at all, one way or another, that cer- <br /> tainly at the present time they would not acs recommend. <br /> GHAIiJtA) LRAKEFA .tom I correct in my interpretation of <br /> your report that the Committee does recommend leaving t ie <br /> sub jest open and awaiting further communication from Commissioner <br /> Streuc as indicated would be forthcoming in his letter of hay <br /> 22nd? An I correct in that? <br /> 4R. VILA L: yes. <br />