Laserfiche WebLink
39 <br /> 70 <br /> O <br /> 0 <br /> c <br /> 0 <br /> m <br /> 0 <br /> D, <br /> ask the representative of the Power Commission for perhaps <br /> a more definite statement of the plans or whatever ideas p' <br /> they had, ana if there was anything to take up concerning it, 0 <br /> we would take it up at the time when we meet with the rep«- <br /> 0 <br /> resentatives of the Interior Department, the Bureau of <br /> Reclamation, and discuss the interests of that department <br /> in our compact and the operation of Caddoa. <br /> CRAIRMAN KRAMER: Is there any discussion on the point <br /> just presented by Mr. Vidal? I might say that the Engineering <br /> Committee has arrived at a similar conclusion, and the portion <br /> of the letter which Mr. Vidal refers to is the third pare- <br /> graph from the end of Mr. Olds' letter of September 26, the <br /> conclusion of the Engineering Committee being that this tied <br /> in direotly with transmountain diversion projects which are <br /> being planned by the Bureau of Reclamation, and must neces- <br /> sarily be considered in conjunction with our meeting with the <br /> Bureau of Reclamation, and that we should obtain whatever <br /> applifioation to that contained in this paragraph that Mr. <br /> Gatohell might be able to give us. I see no other course <br /> of action that we can follow. <br /> Is there any other discussion of that matter? If not, <br /> we will pass on to the report of the Committee on Engineering <br /> Data and Studies, which I will read. <br /> (Chairman Kramer thereupon read the report of the <br /> Committee on Engineering Data and Studies. ) <br />