My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Transcripts of the Arkansas River Compact Commissions 01/22,23/1947
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
7001-8000
>
Transcripts of the Arkansas River Compact Commissions 01/22,23/1947
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2014 1:50:04 PM
Creation date
11/17/2014 3:46:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Seventh Meeting of the Arkansas River Compact Commissions01/22,23/1947 Topeka, Kansas
State
KS
Author
Commissioners
Title
Seventh Meeting of the Arkansas River Compact Commissions01/22,23/1947 Topeka, Kansas
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
38 m. <br /> O <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> AFTERNOON SESSION <br /> 2 O' clock <br /> The hearing was resumed, pursuant to recess, in the o <br /> Mate Capitol Building. <br /> (Discussion off the record. ) <br /> CHAIRMAN KRA: ER: Are we ready to resume, gentlemen? <br /> If so, the meeting will be in order. <br /> Mr. Knapp has retyped the copies of Articles X and XI <br /> that were under discussion this morning with the corrections <br /> made that were presented. I will pass those around. <br /> We were engaged in our last item of business in the <br /> report from the Committee on Legal Affairs, and had devoted <br /> ours elves to its report on the ,paramountcy clause. Is there <br /> any further report from the Committee on Legal Affairs, Mr. <br /> Vidal? <br /> MR. VIDAL: What I said a few minutes ago. Do you <br /> want me to repeat it? <br /> CHAIRMAN KRA M ;R: If you will. <br /> N.H. VIDAL: We further considered the matter of the <br /> portion of Mr. Olds' letter from the Federal Power Commission <br /> concerning the possible contingent use of the Caddoa project <br /> for power in connection, as I understand the letter, only <br /> with the transmountain development project now under contem- <br /> plation by the Department of the Interior, and we felt that <br /> about all that we had to do with that at this time was to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.