Laserfiche WebLink
y xi <br /> 19 m <br /> 1 <br /> O I <br /> of <br /> c <br /> n <br /> ml <br /> alp <br /> thetically, at least from another angle, and tell me, as <br /> representing the United States, whether you apprehend in III <br /> this language that you have presented any objectionable Z <br /> features from the viewpoint of the United States. In other <br /> A <br /> words, if I am figuratively speaking, I would like to make < <br /> cn <br /> Mr. Mitchell Special Assistant Attorney General of the <br /> United States. Do you get my point? <br /> MR. MITCHELL: Yes. It seem/ to me the way that is <br /> drawn, you have a comprehensive answer to any United States <br /> agency by saying that Article XI as proposed there adopts the <br /> provisions of existing federal law, and that the old article <br /> is premised upon present federal legislation as to various <br /> uses and rights, and that we are attempting to go no further <br /> than that. <br /> CHAIRMAN KRAMF„R: I am an incompetent judge legal- <br /> istically. I follow your mechanics, but can you sell it? <br /> MH. MITCHF.TJ,: We contemplated in committee meetings <br /> that the podtion of the United States with the representative <br /> of the United States would be we discuss that angle of it, and <br /> it was the consensus of opinion, without anyone dissenting, <br /> that the complete answer lay in a proposition that this was <br /> premised upon existing federal law. I think we are well in <br /> taking our quotation from Mr. Olds' letter, the first para.- <br /> graph on the second page, where it specifically calls our <br /> attention to these three laws. It says there is no argument <br />