My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Memorandum Agenda Item 11f 05/15/2000
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
Memorandum Agenda Item 11f 05/15/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/23/2014 2:25:14 PM
Creation date
9/23/2014 2:25:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/15/2000
Description
Agenda Item 11f, May 22-23, 2000 Board Meeting Rio Grande Headwaters Restoration Project
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I <br /> • descriptions of alternative strategies for addressing those areas where river condition <br /> • is deemed to be unsatisfactory, <br /> • a recommended overall plan for addressing sub-reaches of unsatisfactory river <br /> condition, and <br /> • recommendations for a river monitoring program. <br /> GIS maps will provide electronic information in graphic form to support and supplement the <br /> reports. The final GIS maps will be housed and maintained at the San Luis Valley GIS/GPS <br /> Authority. <br /> Rio Grande Compact <br /> One important question arose during the scoping process. That question is, "How is the Rio <br /> Grande Compact to be addressed as part of this project?" With input from DWR Division <br /> Engineer, Steve Vandiver, and from Randy Seaholm, a memo was drafted to answer that <br /> question. The memo was provided to all of the consultants. A portion of that memo is provided <br /> below: <br /> • "What is Given and Beyond Negotiation <br /> The index and monitoring stations and the delivery requirements are set by the <br /> schedules outlined in the compact. We cannot propose different delivery amounts <br /> of water. We cannot propose that the Colorado Division of Water Resources set <br /> different curtailments or restrictions on water users in the San Luis Valley. The <br /> volume of water that must be left in the river for New Mexico and Texas are not <br /> part of the scope of this study. <br /> What is Within the Scope of This Study <br /> As you saw on last Monday afternoon's field trip, there are locations on the river <br /> where there will be problems with erosion, deposition, channel migration and/or <br /> overbank flooding if some particular flow threshold is exceeded. We are <br /> concerned that some locations may face such problems when requirements of the <br /> compact call for flow down the river to exceed such a threshold. We want to <br /> learn where, if anywhere, those river locations are and what the problems <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.