My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PCC Meeting 7/8/10 Notes
CWCB
>
ALP Project
>
PCC Meeting 7/8/10 Notes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2016 1:49:02 PM
Creation date
4/16/2013 1:00:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Animas La Plata Project
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PCC Meeting —July 08, 2010 <br />V. <br />VI. <br />Version: August 30, 2010 <br />risks associated with the unknown outcome of the remaining construction <br />activities. If the outcome of the remaining construction work is negative <br />or if further budget cuts occur, they could seriously impact the Project <br />schedule and therefore the cost of the Project. <br />2. No change in risk rating <br />J. Project schedule <br />1. The overall Project Schedule is being impacted. Project float has been <br />reduced, due to hydrology related issues that are beyond our control. The <br />schedule is in jeopardy of delay due to associated increased Project costs. <br />The Contracting Officer assigned to ALP for the last 5 years has accepted <br />a position with another Federal agency. Utilizin o 60, Contracting <br />Officers may impact resolution of remaining, ct issues. The <br />resolution of issues associated with several, f the auxiliary mechanical <br />systems at the pumping plant may result f Future c ys to the pumping <br />schedule. <br />2. No change in risk rating <br />Issue Identification <br />A. FYI budget update <br />1. It looks like there will be a surplus ofl }310 funding, of approximately $15 <br />million. A -LP will hk�ly carry over $5 rn,"on and let the rest go to other <br />Trash Rake <br />1 Reclamahtrtas 1ool�irig into the feasibility and cost of installing a trash <br />rake, rovide information in the future. This may or may not be <br />00st effective; as it will be very complicated, and depending on future <br />op�ons,ci the plant, it may not be necessary or used very often. <br />B. Fish scree "leaner <br />1. The c ble on the fish screen sweeper was replaced. It was possibly worn <br />due to misaligned drums, but this could be an annual maintenance issue. <br />Drums were aligned when the new cable was installed. Reclamation will <br />keep an eye on cable wear. <br />C. Pump units <br />1. It was discovered that three of the large units do have the solids excluder <br />bushing installed. Reclamation's position is that this is a latent defect, and <br />the manufacturer is responsible. <br />D. Guard gate <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.